RE: IBM Dispatcher X iptables AND linux advanced routing

["Seferovic Edvin" <edvin.seferovic@kolp.at>]

Hi,

how can this be achieved? When I have three boxes with the CLUSTERIP
enabled, and each box is connected to a switch and they all have the same IP
address, how will balancing work in such case.

I am sorry for my bad understanding of clustering concepts. Can somebody
give me a hint where to look for ( I would prefer a HowTo explaining how to
set up two boxes and load balancing between those ).

TIA

Regards,

Edvin Seferovic

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of Andre Raabe
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2005 21:16
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: IBM Dispatcher X iptables AND linux advanced routing

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:17:37PM -0300, Bruno Negrão wrote:
> 
> I know it's possible to implement bandwidth control with linux, but what 
> about the second feature? Does someone know if it's possible to implement 
> the second feature using linux?
> 
Maybe take a look at the ClusterIP feature available in newer kernel
versions. Form the iptable man page:
 CLUSTERIP
 This module allows you to configure a simple cluster of nodes that
 share a certain IP and MAC address without an explicit load
 balancer in front of them. Connections are statically distributed
 between the nodes in this cluster.
 
Another possible solution would be IPVS [1], which implements 
transport-layer load balancing.

[1] http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/ipvs.html

Best regards,

-- 
Andre Raabe <raabe@tuxknowledge.org>

GnuPG: 0x5FF2A39C | ECBD D562 72C9 DD1B B741 52C0 AFE1 8DA7 5FF2 A39C
http://www.tuxknowledge.org | bash@jabber.ccc.de | encryption welcome