From: "Seferovic Edvin" <edvin.seferovic@kolp.at>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: IBM Dispatcher X iptables AND linux advanced routing
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:24:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27153.3122439452$1119460801@news.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002601c5774e$499f2c90$5100a8c0@14bis>
Hi,
I am not sure, but that Dispatcher has almost the same ability, as a Radius
Proxy. The Radius Proxy is able to send the Request packets to different
servers ( AFAIK ), without client knowing something about it.
Though LDAP is not same as the RADIUS, but I can imagine that is able to
write a daemon ( on the balancer box ) that allows connections. And this
same daemon should be able to forward the queries to the real servers ( of
course the one that are alive ). It also should be able to know which
servers are alive and which not...
Just my 50 cent... :D
Regards,
Edvin Seferovic
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Negrão
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2005 19:18
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: IBM Dispatcher X iptables AND linux advanced routing
Hi guys,
I'm reading a documentation regarding high availability of LDAP server, and
this
document says it is possible use an IBM network device called IBM Dispatcher
that can automatically divide the bandwidth between two LDAP servers (a
master
and a slave server (that is a replica of the master)). But further on, it
can
route all the LDAP traffic to only one server, if the other server is down.
I know it's possible to implement bandwidth control with linux, but what
about
the second feature? Does someone know if it's possible to implement the
second
feature using linux?
Thank you,
-------------------------------------------------
Bruno Negrao - Network Manager
Engepel Teleinformática. 55-31-34812311
Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-22 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-22 17:17 IBM Dispatcher X iptables AND linux advanced routing Bruno Negrão
2005-06-22 17:24 ` Seferovic Edvin [this message]
2005-06-22 18:14 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-06-22 19:15 ` Andre Raabe
2005-06-22 19:33 ` Seferovic Edvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-22 17:33 Bruno Negrão
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='27153.3122439452$1119460801@news.gmane.org' \
--to=edvin.seferovic@kolp.at \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox