From: =?unknown-8bit?b?wbfK6bPJ?= <s.c.lian@eyou.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: NAT Helper or UPnP?
Date: 5 Jul 2004 14:38:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <289009493.05497@eyou.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040705143812.300.qmail@eyou.com> (raw)
HI,
I really wonder the future of nat helper mechnism because of the UPnP.
UPnP can do all the things that nat helper can do. Using UPnP, If we want
to provide nat traversing in gateway we won't need to survey any application
protocol and just need to support the upnp. Then traversing nat is a task by
application client providers and it is much more simple to them -- they just
provide upnp script or subfunction and publish it in next version.
Then anyone can tell me a more detailed comparision between nat helper and
UPnP and give the advantage of nat helper mechnism comparision the UPnP.
Thank you very much!!!
--s.c.lian
--http://www.eyou.com
--稳定可靠的电子信箱 语音邮件 移动书签 日历服务 网络存储...亿邮未尽
--http://vip.eyou.com
--快快登录亿邮VIP信箱 注册您中意的用户名
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-05 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040705143812.300.qmail@eyou.com>
2004-07-05 6:38 ` =?unknown-8bit?b?wbfK6bPJ?= [this message]
2004-07-05 7:29 ` NAT Helper or UPnP? Antony Stone
2004-07-05 7:48 ` Gavin Hamill
2004-07-05 17:56 ` Mark E. Donaldson
2004-07-05 18:18 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=289009493.05497@eyou.com \
--to=s.c.lian@eyou.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox