RE: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall

[Chip Upsal <cupsal@cyberwolf.com>]

in what ways is this better then heartbeat?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Mickeler [mailto:steve@warning.ca]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster
Cc: Chip Upsal; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall



I'll second the vote for keepalived.

Its an amazing tool.

http://www.keepalived.org/




On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster wrote:

>
> Suggestion: Try using keepalived instead.
>
> Regards,
>
> Forster
>
>
> Chip Upsal <cupsal@cyberwolf.com>@lists.netfilter.org on 03/17/2003
> 01:16:46 PM
>
> Sent by:    netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
>
>
> To:    netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, "'linux-ha@muc.de'"
<linux-ha@muc.de>
> cc:
> Subject:    Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall
>
>
>
> I am looking to use heartbeat to provide fall over for my iptables
> firewall.
> I am looking for those with experience using these tools together.
>
> I plan to use RH7.2 on the firewalls.
>
> I made some attempts at implementing such a solution but i ran into a few
> problems.
>
> I would like suggestions on setup of the heartbeat configuration files.
> Pointers on the iptables startup script. and advice on what kernel version
> to use and if any patches need to be applied.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Chip
>
>
>
>
> Chip Upsal
> SysAdmin
> CyberWolf Inc
>
>
>
>
>