* vrrp question posted on keepalived.org
@ 2002-10-09 17:45 craig e. smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: craig e. smith @ 2002-10-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
i am also going to post this here, as it may be a vrrp iptables issue:
i am setting up a redundant firewall solution using keepalived(vrrp) and
iptables. i use iptables snat to change the source of the traffic from
the firewall to the vrrp virtual address:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.208.69
my question, why don't the vrrp advertisements get snat'ed? not that i
want them to, i don't. but by not specifying a protocol in the above
iptables statement all traffic leaving the box should get snat'ed,
right? any help with this is appreciated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-09 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-09 17:45 vrrp question posted on keepalived.org craig e. smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox