Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Vs pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch]
@ 2002-10-11  4:36 Adharsh Praveen R
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Adharsh Praveen R @ 2002-10-11  4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3051 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]

hai

I am new to the list and new to iptables. Please forgive me if I sound
stupid.

I would like to know the differences between pptp-conntrack-nat.patch
and

pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch.

I am trying to apply these patches to my 2.4.18 kernel.

I am using iptables-1.2.6a.

I applied pptp-conntrack-nat.patch first to the kernel.

Later I tried appling pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch.

when I try to compile the kernel after saying make menuconfig and make
bzImage,

make install, the compilation fails in make modules.

saying

structure has no member named 'master' in ip_conntrack_pptp.c

structure has no member named 'list' in ip_conntrack_pptp.c

(This is for the structure ip_ct_pptp )

when I check the file, the structure has a member called slave.

pptp-conntrack-nat.patch wants a member called master in the structure.

where as pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch adds a member called slave in the
structure.

Can I apply these two patches together or any one of them is enough

for PPTP to function with NAT.

Can anyone enlighten me on this?

Thanks in advance.

regards,
adharsh.

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1249 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-11  4:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-11  4:36 pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Vs pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch] Adharsh Praveen R

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox