* protocol specification
@ 2003-09-16 4:07 cc
2003-09-17 9:50 ` Oskar Andreasson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: cc @ 2003-09-16 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Netfilter
Hi,
Can someone clarify whether I've made a mistake or
mis understood the tutorial? I'm using the latest
iptables (1.2.8 I believe) on a Linux 2.4.22 machine.
In the tutorial, it says -p tcp,udp is permitted;
but the manpage states nothing of the sort(but
implies that it can't be done that way).
In the past, I've been using two lines for both
tcp and udp settings. I just decided to re-read
on the tutorial and noticed that I could use
the tcp,udp (or udp,tcp) way. Saves space.
But it doesn't work. I googled and came up with
an archived message stating that there is indeed
an error, but that was two years ago.
If it is indeed true that I can't specify protocols
like that, is there a patch that can allow me to
do this?
Thanks for the clarification.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: protocol specification
2003-09-16 4:07 protocol specification cc
@ 2003-09-17 9:50 ` Oskar Andreasson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oskar Andreasson @ 2003-09-17 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cc; +Cc: Netfilter
Bad mistake on my part actually, and for some strange reason, people tend
to discover bugs "in group" (you're the 3rd person talking about
this in less than a week;)). In other words, I have this fixed locally,
will update when I get the rest of the material finished.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, cc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone clarify whether I've made a mistake or
> mis understood the tutorial? I'm using the latest
> iptables (1.2.8 I believe) on a Linux 2.4.22 machine.
>
> In the tutorial, it says -p tcp,udp is permitted;
> but the manpage states nothing of the sort(but
> implies that it can't be done that way).
>
> In the past, I've been using two lines for both
> tcp and udp settings. I just decided to re-read
> on the tutorial and noticed that I could use
> the tcp,udp (or udp,tcp) way. Saves space.
>
> But it doesn't work. I googled and came up with
> an archived message stating that there is indeed
> an error, but that was two years ago.
>
> If it is indeed true that I can't specify protocols
> like that, is there a patch that can allow me to
> do this?
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>
>
>
----
Oskar Andreasson
http://www.frozentux.net
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net
http://ipsysctl-tutorial.frozentux.net
mailto:blueflux@koffein.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-17 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-16 4:07 protocol specification cc
2003-09-17 9:50 ` Oskar Andreasson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox