From: Frans Luteijn <f.a.g.luteijn@knoware.nl>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: nat problem
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:33:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E982F0.309A28A3@knoware.nl> (raw)
Dear Sirs,
I have a little problem, which might be a bug. I have an 3COM
ISDN-router. It broadcasts every 10 seconds its connectionstatus to the
internal net. Now I want to forward those broadcasts to another network.
This is the situation:
+------+ +--------+ +--------+
|ISDN- | | | |Internal|
|router|----|firewall|----|network |
+------+ | | +--------+
+--------+
|
|
|
+------+
|ADSL- |
|router|
+------+
The ISDN-router has 192.168.1.1/24, the ADSL-router has 172.19.3.1/16,
the firewall has at eth0 192.168.1.4, at eth1 172.19.3.2 and at eth2
192.168.2.1. The internal network is 192.168.2.0/24.
The firewall is a Debian-Linux with a 2.4.26 kernel with Nat enabled.
After reading of all the nesesary HOWTO's, I decided that that
forwarding should be done with prerouting. To know what I have to
forward, I have to know what the packets are. I turned logging on for
that interface, and if I can log the packets, I can also manipulate
them.
So I typed:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j LOG
and waited for the packets to come by. But nothing happened. Althought I
could see some other packets coming in. From my log:
Jul 2 16:38:16 firewall kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:50:04:0e:d9:00:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.3
DST=192.168.1.255 LEN=240 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=32 ID=19499 PROTO=UDP
SPT=138 DPT=138 LEN=220
Jul 2 16:43:40 firewall kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:50:04:0e:d9:00:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.3
DST=192.168.1.255 LEN=240 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=32 ID=19755 PROTO=UDP
SPT=138 DPT=138 LEN=220
Those are from a machine that will be moved to my internal network
Then I typed:
iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -j LOG
and there were the packets:
Jul 2 16:47:43 firewall kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:08:00:4e:a6:f5:74:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.1
DST=192.168.1.255 LEN=116 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=48404 PROTO=UDP
SPT=1025 DPT=2071 LEN=96
Jul 2 16:47:53 firewall kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:08:00:4e:a6:f5:74:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.1
DST=192.168.1.255 LEN=116 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=48405 PROTO=UDP
SPT=1025 DPT=2071 LEN=96
Jul 2 16:48:03 firewall kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:08:00:4e:a6:f5:74:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.1
DST=192.168.1.255 LEN=116 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=48406 PROTO=UDP
SPT=1025 DPT=2071 LEN=96
In /proc/net/ip_conntrack I can see:
udp 17 27 src=192.168.1.3 dst=192.168.1.255 sport=138 dport=138
[UNREPLIED] src=192.168.1.255 dst=192.168.1.3 sport=138 dport=138 use=1
udp 17 20 src=192.168.1.1 dst=192.168.1.255 sport=1025 dport=2071
[UNREPLIED] src=192.168.1.255 dst=192.168.1.1 sport=2071 dport=1025
use=1
.......
Now are my questions:
am I doing something wrong, e.g. shouldn't it be prerouting;
can't it be done, because of the sourceport and the destport are
different;
is it a bug in the nat-software or is it intended to work that way?
If you need some extra information, I am happily to provide it.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Frans Luteijn
PGP PblKey fprnt=C4 87 CE AF BC B6 98 C1 EF 42 A1 9A E2 C0 42 5B
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-05 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 16:33 Frans Luteijn [this message]
2004-07-07 13:07 ` nat problem Antony Stone
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-13 20:40 Frans Luteijn
2004-07-13 21:06 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-13 22:21 ` Frans Luteijn
2004-07-13 22:53 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-13 23:11 ` Nick Taylor
2004-07-14 1:02 ` Frans Luteijn
2004-07-14 8:53 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-14 23:30 ` Frans Luteijn
2004-07-15 8:21 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-19 1:26 ` Frans Luteijn
2003-10-06 12:30 NAT problem Jose Pascual
2003-10-06 13:19 ` Venkatesh. K
2003-10-06 13:33 ` Cedric Blancher
2003-10-06 20:38 ` Joel Newkirk
2002-11-22 22:52 nat problem Yogini Parkhi
2002-11-15 20:45 Rahul Jadhav
2002-10-21 13:04 NAT problem saravanan sakthi
2002-10-21 15:15 ` Antony Stone
2002-10-20 23:20 NAT Problem Morgan
2002-06-24 11:11 Nat PROBLEM lcef
2002-06-24 13:34 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-15 22:14 Completely NAT an ISP: A practical possibility? Brian Capouch
2002-06-15 22:33 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-15 23:17 ` Nick Drage
2002-06-17 4:25 ` Sathi
2002-06-17 10:58 ` nat problem umar
2002-06-17 18:11 ` Antony Stone
2002-05-09 4:41 NAT problem Tyler Kemp
2002-06-13 16:03 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40E982F0.309A28A3@knoware.nl \
--to=f.a.g.luteijn@knoware.nl \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox