* Iptables as packet shaper
@ 2005-05-14 11:51 Wennie V. Lagmay
2005-05-14 15:39 ` Jason Opperisano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wennie V. Lagmay @ 2005-05-14 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hi all,
Im using iptables to filter, translate IP address and forward traffic, Im
using squid delay_pool to limit client access per user and per network, but
im having a limitation with the squid delay_pool. I want to have a packet
shaper that can can allow my user to have 32 kbps during peer time and 256
during off peek time. Delay_pool is not capable of that. Can IPTABLES do
this kind of shaping?
Thank you very much,
wennie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Iptables as packet shaper
2005-05-14 11:51 Iptables as packet shaper Wennie V. Lagmay
@ 2005-05-14 15:39 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-15 5:58 ` Wennie V. Lagmay
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Opperisano @ 2005-05-14 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:51:55PM +0300, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Im using iptables to filter, translate IP address and forward traffic, Im
> using squid delay_pool to limit client access per user and per network, but
> im having a limitation with the squid delay_pool. I want to have a packet
> shaper that can can allow my user to have 32 kbps during peer time and 256
> during off peek time. Delay_pool is not capable of that. Can IPTABLES do
> this kind of shaping?
no--bandwidth management is not the job of iptables, it is the job of tc
from the iproute2 package. details are at:
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.html
lartc also has their own ML:
http://lartc.org/#mailinglist
-j
--
"Peter: Wow, is that really the blood of Christ?
Preacher: Yes, it is.
Peter: Holy crap, that guy must've been wasted 24 hours a day."
--Family Guy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Iptables as packet shaper
2005-05-14 15:39 ` Jason Opperisano
@ 2005-05-15 5:58 ` Wennie V. Lagmay
2005-05-15 6:48 ` Robert Vangel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wennie V. Lagmay @ 2005-05-15 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Opperisano, netfilter
If im not mistaken TC require iptroute 2. If im already using iptables for
my routing, firewall and NAT, do I need to disable iptables for iproute2 or
iptables and iproutes works hand in hand
thanks,
wennie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Opperisano" <opie@817west.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: Iptables as packet shaper
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:51:55PM +0300, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Im using iptables to filter, translate IP address and forward traffic,
>> Im
>> using squid delay_pool to limit client access per user and per network,
>> but
>> im having a limitation with the squid delay_pool. I want to have a packet
>> shaper that can can allow my user to have 32 kbps during peer time and
>> 256
>> during off peek time. Delay_pool is not capable of that. Can IPTABLES do
>> this kind of shaping?
>
> no--bandwidth management is not the job of iptables, it is the job of tc
> from the iproute2 package. details are at:
>
> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.html
>
> lartc also has their own ML:
>
> http://lartc.org/#mailinglist
>
> -j
>
> --
> "Peter: Wow, is that really the blood of Christ?
> Preacher: Yes, it is.
> Peter: Holy crap, that guy must've been wasted 24 hours a day."
> --Family Guy
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Iptables as packet shaper
2005-05-15 5:58 ` Wennie V. Lagmay
@ 2005-05-15 6:48 ` Robert Vangel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Vangel @ 2005-05-15 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 369 bytes --]
Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
> If im not mistaken TC require iptroute 2. If im already using iptables
> for my routing, firewall and NAT, do I need to disable iptables for
> iproute2 or iptables and iproutes works hand in hand
>
> thanks,
>
> wennie
>
In a nutshell, iptables is for filtering, iproute for routing. They
don't clash & you use both of them together.
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3166 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-15 6:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-14 11:51 Iptables as packet shaper Wennie V. Lagmay
2005-05-14 15:39 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-15 5:58 ` Wennie V. Lagmay
2005-05-15 6:48 ` Robert Vangel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox