From: "Jörg Harmuth" <harmuth@mnemon.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:53:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DFA8D1.207@mnemon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507211523100.27131@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Jozsef Kadlecsik schrieb:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>
>>>local process -> routing -> OUTPUT chain -> routing -> POSTROUTING chain
>>>
>>>No problem with policy routing for the locally generated traffic.
>>
>>This sounds like a total overhead calculating the route twice.
>
>
> The first one is required to fill out output device for the packet. The
> second one is there to give chance to play with routing in OUTPUT.
Still only 95% clear to me. You say, the second routing decision takes
place right after filter/OUTPUT ? And if so, do packets after
filter/FORWARD have this second routing decision too ?
Have a nice time,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-21 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-21 4:50 is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail? Edmundo Carmona
2005-07-21 11:23 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-21 13:15 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-07-21 13:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-21 13:27 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-07-21 13:53 ` Jörg Harmuth [this message]
2005-07-21 14:02 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-07-21 14:09 ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-08-10 15:37 ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-08-10 20:06 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-08-10 20:11 ` /dev/rob0
2005-08-11 15:06 ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-08-11 5:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-21 14:06 ` Edmundo Carmona
2005-07-21 14:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
[not found] ` <65aa6af9050721071866e3c73b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507211650020.23894@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
2005-07-21 15:04 ` Edmundo Carmona
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42DFA8D1.207@mnemon.de \
--to=harmuth@mnemon.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox