Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail?

[Edmundo Carmona <eantoranz@gmail.com>]

Oh, I think I see what you mean.

That multipath thing is driving me crazy, man.

I just tested what Jozsef told us,  that there's a routing decision
right after output if something changed in the packet. He is so right!
I marked a packet in the output mangle, and it was routed according to
that mark.

Thank you, Jozsef!

On 7/21/05, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> 
> >>> I think it's because they're both on the same network.
> >>
> >> Load balancing using route path cost and tc is done on a per-device basis;
> >
> >Oh, ok. Good! (I need a translator!).
> >What do you mean? I didn't get it. (I'm kind of ashamed :-)).
> 
> If you do load balancing / traffic shaping using iptables, you operate on a
> per-packet or per-connection basis (depending on what you do)
> 
> If you do load balancing with /sbin/route, you operate at the device level.
> If you do traffic shaping with /sbin/tc, you operate at the device level.
> 
> 
> 
> Jan Engelhardt
> --
>