From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Bridge Transparent Proxy
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:07:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465369AF.2060107@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46533B98.9030706@riverviewtech.net>
Grant Taylor a écrit :
>
> Let me re-layout the network including IP addresses.
>
> (INet [A.B.C.Z]) --- (BRouter [A.B.C.D]) --- ([A.B.C.E] Server(s)
> [192.168.144.254] --- ([192.168.144.1-100])
>
> Here you can see that you have the same subnet of A.B.C.x on both sides
> of the bridging router.
Now I see. But wouldn't it be worth subnetting A.B.C.x ?
> There is no good (read easy) way to have the
> same subnet on multiple sides of a router
Do you mean that ARP proxy would not be a good way ? Ok, I guess it
would disrupt IP broadcasts a bit...
> short of double natting which
> in and of its self is not easy to do on a singular box.
Anyway NAT is evil. Don't use unless you can't avoid it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 14:28 Bridge Transparent Proxy Jon Tim
2007-05-22 14:35 ` Robert LeBlanc
2007-05-22 16:06 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-23 5:56 ` Jon Tim
2007-05-23 13:39 ` Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-22 16:09 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 17:07 ` Robert LeBlanc
2007-05-22 18:30 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 18:36 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-22 18:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 19:26 ` NAT addresses - RFC or tradition? Paul Blondé
2007-05-22 19:46 ` Andre Guimarães
2007-05-22 19:57 ` Tim Evans
2007-05-22 20:02 ` Marius-Iulian Corici
2007-06-18 17:27 ` R. DuFresne
2007-06-18 17:25 ` R. DuFresne
2007-05-22 20:02 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2007-05-22 20:22 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 21:39 ` Bridge Transparent Proxy Petr Pisar
2007-05-22 22:07 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2007-05-23 0:25 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 18:39 ` Robert LeBlanc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-24 12:28 bridge + transparent proxy Jason Opperisano
2004-08-24 13:13 ` ArioS
2004-08-24 5:11 Multiple IPSEC VPNs through a firewall based on 2.4.2X kernel Roksana Boreli
2004-08-24 5:46 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2004-08-24 7:32 ` Payal Rathod
2004-08-24 7:50 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2004-08-24 8:53 ` bridge + transparent proxy ArioS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465369AF.2060107@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox