From: Robert LeBlanc <robert@leblancnet.us>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Bridge Transparent Proxy
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:39:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C27894F4.1C28B%robert@leblancnet.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465336C4.5060600@riverviewtech.net>
On 5/22/07 12:30 PM, "Grant Taylor" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net> wrote:
> On 05/22/07 12:07, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> Thanks, I wasn't aware of this option as I haven't done much with
>> bridging since I had lots of trouble with trying to bridge and NAT on
>> the same network (use allow the same physical network after my linux
>> gateway to carry my public network and the NATed private network). I
>> will have to look into it again, this option may have been a cause of
>> some of my issues.
>
> *nod* Bridging Routers can be interesting critters to work with.
>
> Brouters are usually used to allow globally routable systems IP
> addresses to be used in front of and behind a firewall (of sorts). I.e.
> a small block of IP addresses that the brouter uses for its external IP
> address as well as internal public servers use IP addresses from to be
> directly accessible from the net with out any sort of NAT.
>
> (INet) --- (Cable / DSL modem) --- (BRouter) --- (Server(s)
> --- (Workstation(s))
>
> To pull this off usually you bridge the internal and external NICs
> together and multi home the bridge interface for your internal and
> external IP addresses. I.e. bri0 = A.B.C.D and bri0:1 = 192.168.144.254
> are your IP addresses.
>
> In this case, you only bridge traffic to / from the A.B.C.x network and
> route any thing else. You can even serve DHCP on the internal LAN with
> out a problem.
>
> In this scenario, you can use either EBTables or IPTables to do your
> filtering. The only thing you need to remember is to not bridge (DROP
> in the brouting table / BROUTE chain) any internal traffic and force it
> to be routed. Another way to say it is to only bridge traffic to / from
> your globally routable IP addresses. Remember that you will need to
> pass some ARP traffic too.
>
>
>
>
> Grant. . . .
>
That is what I did, I think there was a slight mis-configuration and my NAT
was dropping traffic like crazy. It would only happen after a period of time
though, no error messages that I could see. I had three separate internal
nets and the 192.168.1.x would not work, but 192.168.2.x would more then the
other one. I never did try out 192.168.3.x because I had so many issues with
the first two. I'll have to look into it again someday. I just moved my
servers out in front of my gateway for the time being.
Robert LeBlanc
BioAg Computer Support
Brigham Young University
leblanc@byu.edu
(801)422-1882
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 14:28 Bridge Transparent Proxy Jon Tim
2007-05-22 14:35 ` Robert LeBlanc
2007-05-22 16:06 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-23 5:56 ` Jon Tim
2007-05-23 13:39 ` Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-22 16:09 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 17:07 ` Robert LeBlanc
2007-05-22 18:30 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 18:36 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-22 18:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 19:26 ` NAT addresses - RFC or tradition? Paul Blondé
2007-05-22 19:46 ` Andre Guimarães
2007-05-22 19:57 ` Tim Evans
2007-05-22 20:02 ` Marius-Iulian Corici
2007-06-18 17:27 ` R. DuFresne
2007-06-18 17:25 ` R. DuFresne
2007-05-22 20:02 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2007-05-22 20:22 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 21:39 ` Bridge Transparent Proxy Petr Pisar
2007-05-22 22:07 ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-23 0:25 ` Grant Taylor
2007-05-22 18:39 ` Robert LeBlanc [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-24 12:28 bridge + transparent proxy Jason Opperisano
2004-08-24 13:13 ` ArioS
2004-08-24 5:11 Multiple IPSEC VPNs through a firewall based on 2.4.2X kernel Roksana Boreli
2004-08-24 5:46 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2004-08-24 7:32 ` Payal Rathod
2004-08-24 7:50 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2004-08-24 8:53 ` bridge + transparent proxy ArioS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C27894F4.1C28B%robert@leblancnet.us \
--to=robert@leblancnet.us \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox