Is it a bug???

Is it a bug???

[Gáspár Lajos]

Hi List,

I have a lot of these messages in my syslog:

 fw01 kernel: nf_ct_icmp: bad HW ICMP checksum IN= OUT= SRC=84.0.19.129 
DST={EXT_IP} LEN=158 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=123 ID=7437 PROTO=ICMP 
TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC={EXT_IP} DST=84.0.19.129 LEN=130 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 
TTL=123 ID=53146 PROTO=UDP SPT=49702 DPT=12082 LEN=110 ]

Are these messages related to the REJECT target?
And if yes then there is a bug in the conntrack?

Thanx,

 Swifty

Re: Is it a bug???

[Grant Taylor]

On 11/10/08 08:44, Gáspár Lajos wrote:
> Are these messages related to the REJECT target?
> And if yes then there is a bug in the conntrack?

Please search the (recent) archives of this mailing list for a details 
description of this problem.

If I recall correctly, no this is not a NetFilter / Connection Tracking 
bug.  This has more to do with a NIC driver problem using offloading of 
some processing to the processor on the card.



Grant. . . .

is it a BUG?

[Husnu Demir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Today I found that mistakenly I have wrote VLAN5 instead of vlan5 for
the interface name in iptables. And found out that capital letter is
not same with small letters :) When I think as *nix user it is correct
but somehow I didnot think about that. So CASE is important for iptables.






Interesting.

Best Regards,

Husnu Demir.
Network.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSTWYsAAoJEISpBAM51qlEtkAH/1xyHDvKHQFFgcja2BAqbYgc
khv+/XHjeWomKSZQGiTwo4x4BPmS6nvQ9tuw8Q8i0u7MXZp9esZ+fneWoe+cwglO
rtiHgsfRN/99lkVupQIuyf0FTm727jL3uQDIXqfMHCBZF+r6hbxZiZsFRZJ2mexG
h0thG7G3B3OBfHPldSx0Ura6qmVkP6PQoRcwHtl2LwCO520AbXV1hYyIeXSYfqNR
MB4IzGz4hpwpSkO4z3C3BYL3fDjJSSIqTYAfmsvdH5u7BomSK551TGIU8Rl1mjbP
1u3EfBQDW4L4hLxmIX8C2IAQOK9KxPb1CTYq1XfoYsFH+mK2uk88JI7C1/ITdHQ=
=MWFJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: is it a BUG?

[Tom van Leeuwen]

Too me personally case sensitivity is exactly the (default) behaviour 
that I would expect in *nix and also in iptables.

On 10/03/2013 02:42 PM, Husnu Demir wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Today I found that mistakenly I have wrote VLAN5 instead of vlan5 for
> the interface name in iptables. And found out that capital letter is
> not same with small letters :) When I think as *nix user it is correct
> but somehow I didnot think about that. So CASE is important for iptables.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Husnu Demir.
> Network.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSTWYsAAoJEISpBAM51qlEtkAH/1xyHDvKHQFFgcja2BAqbYgc
> khv+/XHjeWomKSZQGiTwo4x4BPmS6nvQ9tuw8Q8i0u7MXZp9esZ+fneWoe+cwglO
> rtiHgsfRN/99lkVupQIuyf0FTm727jL3uQDIXqfMHCBZF+r6hbxZiZsFRZJ2mexG
> h0thG7G3B3OBfHPldSx0Ura6qmVkP6PQoRcwHtl2LwCO520AbXV1hYyIeXSYfqNR
> MB4IzGz4hpwpSkO4z3C3BYL3fDjJSSIqTYAfmsvdH5u7BomSK551TGIU8Rl1mjbP
> 1u3EfBQDW4L4hLxmIX8C2IAQOK9KxPb1CTYq1XfoYsFH+mK2uk88JI7C1/ITdHQ=
> =MWFJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html