From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INVALID state
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:15:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8A504F.6060803@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8A4AEE.8080007@iit.bme.hu>
On 28.02.2010 11:52, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> On 28.02.2010 10:31, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> Could someone help me to identify the difference between
>>> the following 3 rules.
>>>
>>> 1. iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state
>>> INVALID -j DROP
>>> 2. iptables -A INPUT -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
>>> 3. iptables -A INPUP -p tcp ! --syn -m conntrack --cstate INVALID -j
>>> DROP
>>>
>>
>>
>> take a look at this picture, to see, that mangle/PREROUTING may catch
>> different things than filter/INPUT:
>> http://jengelh.medozas.de/images/nf-packet-flow.png
>>
>> Generally filtering (ACCEPT/DROP/REJECT) should be done in the filter
>> table, unless there is a good reason (and understanding) to do it
>> otherwise (i.e. the nat table does not allow DROP).
>> The mangle table is generally meant for packet manipulation. i.e.
>> marking, changing ip settings, etc...
>>
>> conntrack supports all states that the state match does, plus some more.
>>
>>
>> More in general:
>> imho the '! --syn' is quite unnecessary, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
> Thanks for the help.
>
np, but please switch to bottom posting...
> Assuming that the a packet reach the 1,2,3 rules is there a
> difference regards matching between "-m state --state INVALID"
> applied in 1 and 2 rules or the "-m conntrack --cstate INVALID"
> statements?
>
requoting myself:
> conntrack supports all states that the state match does, plus some more
so, no difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-28 9:24 INVALID state Nemeth Denes
2010-02-28 10:10 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 10:52 ` Nemeth Denes
2010-02-28 11:15 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-13 18:16 Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 22:31 ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-13 22:34 ` Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 23:01 ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-12 22:08 Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 11:13 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-11-13 12:16 ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-13 12:48 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-11-13 13:08 ` Christoph Paasch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8A504F.6060803@chello.at \
--to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox