From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: David TAILLANDIER - DIGI VALUE <david.taillandier@digi-value.fr>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "raw" table versus "filter" table
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:10:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564D83E7.7030207@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564CF1D6.9000709@digi-value.fr>
David TAILLANDIER - DIGI VALUE a écrit :
>
> The documentations I found always describe the raw table to be used in
> strict cases. But none give even the smallest justification.
>
> --> Is there any reasons not to use the raw table, apart dogmatic ones ?
Any match that requires conntrack, NAT or routing to be applied won't
work in the raw table. Only simple rules are possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 21:47 "raw" table versus "filter" table David TAILLANDIER - DIGI VALUE
2015-11-19 0:17 ` Neal P. Murphy
2015-11-19 8:10 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564D83E7.7030207@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=david.taillandier@digi-value.fr \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox