RE: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink

RE: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink

[Carl Farrington]

Well it looks like patch-o-matic-ng doesn't support 2.6 yet. I find it
very confusing. The only information I found on kernel 2.6 was a very
short "News" from December 2003 which said "expect a patch-o-matic-ng
which will support 2.6". Which led me to think NG would work on 2.6 but
alas not yet.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: T. Horsnell (tsh) [mailto:tsh@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk]
> Sent: 19 February 2004 15:41
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink
> 
> Problem using patch-o-matic-ng-20040217 to patch kernel 2.6.2
> and iptables-1.2.9, to include the nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch.
> 
> When I use .runme to test this patch, it reports:
> 'Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly'
> When I actually install the patch, it reports errors,
> but installs it anyway.
> 
> Re-make of the kernel then fails:
> 
> [root@dev1 linux-2.6.2]# make bzImage
>   HOSTCC  scripts/modpost.o
>   HOSTLD  scripts/modpost
> make[2]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:593: syntax error, unexpected T_WORD
> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:595: invalid menu option
> make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
> make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2
> 
> Any advice?
> 
> Cheers,
> Terry.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
========================================================================
=
> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!
> 
> Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
> Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables
> 
> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Already applied:
> 
> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... not applied
> The nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch:
>    Author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>, Jay Schulist
> <jschlst@samba.org>,
>    Status: Under development, but stabilizing now.
> 
>         Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> 
>    Add recent work by patrick (notifiers, event messages to userspace.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] t
> Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y
> ERROR (7 rejects out of 52 hunks)
> 
> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
>
========================================================================
=
> 
> Checking whether the patch was actually installed:
> 
> 
>
========================================================================
=
> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!
> 
> Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
> Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables
> 
> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Already applied:
> 
> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... applied
> 
> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
>
========================================================================
=
> 

Re: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink

[T. Horsnell (tsh)]

I'm likewise confused. Maybe I'm jumping the gun a bit. I just
want to experiment with nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13, so perhaps
I'll revert to a late 2.4 kernel.

Thanks,
Terry.

>Well it looks like patch-o-matic-ng doesn't support 2.6 yet. I find it
>very confusing. The only information I found on kernel 2.6 was a very
>short "News" from December 2003 which said "expect a patch-o-matic-ng
>which will support 2.6". Which led me to think NG would work on 2.6 but
>alas not yet.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: T. Horsnell (tsh) [mailto:tsh@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk]
>> Sent: 19 February 2004 15:41
>> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
>> Subject: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink
>> 
>> Problem using patch-o-matic-ng-20040217 to patch kernel 2.6.2
>> and iptables-1.2.9, to include the nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch.
>> 
>> When I use .runme to test this patch, it reports:
>> 'Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly'
>> When I actually install the patch, it reports errors,
>> but installs it anyway.
>> 
>> Re-make of the kernel then fails:
>> 
>> [root@dev1 linux-2.6.2]# make bzImage
>>   HOSTCC  scripts/modpost.o
>>   HOSTLD  scripts/modpost
>> make[2]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
>> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:593: syntax error, unexpected T_WORD
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:595: invalid menu option
>> make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
>> make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2
>> 
>> Any advice?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Terry.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>========================================================================
>=
>> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!
>> 
>> Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
>> Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables
>> 
>> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
>> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Already applied:
>> 
>> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... not applied
>> The nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch:
>>    Author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>, Jay Schulist
>> <jschlst@samba.org>,
>>    Status: Under development, but stabilizing now.
>> 
>>         Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
>> 
>>    Add recent work by patrick (notifiers, event messages to userspace.
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] t
>> Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y
>> ERROR (7 rejects out of 52 hunks)
>> 
>> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
>>
>========================================================================
>=
>> 
>> Checking whether the patch was actually installed:
>> 
>> 
>>
>========================================================================
>=
>> Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!
>> 
>> Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
>> Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables
>> 
>> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
>> Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Already applied:
>> 
>> Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... applied
>> 
>> Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
>>
>========================================================================
>=
>> 
>
>
>

p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink

[T. Horsnell (tsh)]

Problem using patch-o-matic-ng-20040217 to patch kernel 2.6.2 
and iptables-1.2.9, to include the nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch.

When I use .runme to test this patch, it reports:
'Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly'
When I actually install the patch, it reports errors,
but installs it anyway.

Re-make of the kernel then fails:

[root@dev1 linux-2.6.2]# make bzImage
  HOSTCC  scripts/modpost.o
  HOSTLD  scripts/modpost
make[2]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:593: syntax error, unexpected T_WORD
net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig:595: invalid menu option
make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
make: *** [include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2

Any advice?

Cheers,
Terry.





=========================================================================
Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!

Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables

Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
-------------------------------------------------------
Already applied: 

Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... not applied
The nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch:
   Author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>, Jay Schulist <jschlst@samba.org>,
   Status: Under development, but stabilizing now.

        Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
   
   Add recent work by patrick (notifiers, event messages to userspace.
   
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] t
Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y
ERROR (7 rejects out of 52 hunks)

Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
=========================================================================

Checking whether the patch was actually installed:


=========================================================================
Welcome to Patch-o-matic (1.11)!

Kernel:         /usr/src/linux-2.6.2
Iptables:       /usr/src/iptables

Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
Almost every one has bugs, so don't apply what you don't need!
-------------------------------------------------------
Already applied: 

Testing nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13... applied

Excellent! Source trees are ready for compilation.
=========================================================================

Re: p.o.m-ng+linux-2.6.2+ctnetlink

[Jozsef Kadlecsik]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, T. Horsnell (tsh) wrote:

> Problem using patch-o-matic-ng-20040217 to patch kernel 2.6.2
> and iptables-1.2.9, to include the nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 patch.
>
> When I use .runme to test this patch, it reports:
> 'Patch nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.13 applies cleanly'
> When I actually install the patch, it reports errors,
> but installs it anyway.

Thank you the bugreport, I'll look into it.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@sunserv.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary