Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcin Szewczyk <marcin.szewczyk@wodny.org>
To: Fatih USTA <fatihusta86@gmail.com>
Cc: Eliezer Croitor <ngtech1ltd@gmail.com>,
	'Netfilter Users Mailing list' <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: re-routing multicast pkts after mangle table marking
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:03:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X8fI7ZzRS1zycdeS@flatwhite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6c5895d-145a-3a04-3064-40d42db75be7@gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 07:30:11PM +0300, Fatih USTA wrote:
> I'm not sure, am I understand you correctly?

I sincerely have no idea which part of the thread you are referencing.

> But I created testing topology with namespace for multicast routing and it
> worked.

And it is not a surprise. I have already mentioned at the beginning that
I have experimented with success using namespaces, see:
https://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=160685018618860
And also mentioned veth:
https://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=160691271903616
It worked even without smcroute.

> I tested on ubuntu 18.04 but probably works on debian buster too.

This does not answer the main question: why doesn't fwmark work with `ip
rule` for multicast and broadcast traffic, see:
- https://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=142714167809246
- https://marc.info/?l=netfilter&m=160685018618860

-- 
Marcin Szewczyk
http://wodny.org

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-23 20:14 re-routing multicast pkts after mangle table marking Brian Aanderud
2020-12-01 18:49 ` Marcin Szewczyk
     [not found]   ` <CAF4tN+_YNz+0iCQzW7Fd+P5ZkDkU5g95Jv5fdHPNcqhzWtOOng@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <X8bE6GMR6U37cfH/@flatwhite>
     [not found]       ` <CAN_K0LS+U95rxmhCtiE3sX_hdjEQySnV1HBB9sF1qrrVAz0n-w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-12-02 11:23         ` Marcin Szewczyk
2020-12-02 12:10           ` Eliezer Croitor
2020-12-02 12:36             ` Marcin Szewczyk
2020-12-02 15:57               ` Eliezer Croitor
2020-12-02 16:12                 ` Marcin Szewczyk
2020-12-02 16:30                   ` Fatih USTA
2020-12-02 17:03                     ` Marcin Szewczyk [this message]
2020-12-02 17:35                   ` Eliezer Croitor
2020-12-02 18:04                     ` Marcin Szewczyk
2020-12-03  8:39                       ` Fatih USTA

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X8fI7ZzRS1zycdeS@flatwhite \
    --to=marcin.szewczyk@wodny.org \
    --cc=fatihusta86@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngtech1ltd@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox