* Re: client side "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161" at accessing CIFS share
[not found] <0b004319-9ef7-437c-a4dd-174d6a9a83db@mailbox.org>
@ 2026-09-01 23:19 ` Paulo Alcantara
2026-09-16 9:42 ` Hao Ge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Alcantara @ 2026-09-01 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erhard Furtner, linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-cifs, David Howells, netfs
Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org> writes:
> Getting this "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING:" every time on my
> client PC when I open files on the CIFS share (exported via KSMBD) from
> my host PC:
The warning is triggered by running the following in
netfs_alloc_request() with CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y kernels:
rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data);
for the non-writeback path.
@mempool->alloc is set to mempool_alloc_slab(), which calls
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof() directly and expects the caller to have
already set current->alloc_tag.
It doesn't occur in the writeback path, however, because we call
mempool_alloc() macro that wraps to
alloc_hooks(mempool_alloc_noprof(...))
and it sets current->alloc_tag before the allocation.
I'll look for a possible solution and then let you know.
Thanks for the report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: client side "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161" at accessing CIFS share
2026-09-01 23:19 ` client side "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161" at accessing CIFS share Paulo Alcantara
@ 2026-09-16 9:42 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-20 19:08 ` Erhard Furtner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hao Ge @ 2026-09-16 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Alcantara, Erhard Furtner
Cc: linux-cifs, David Howells, netfs, linux-kernel
Hi Paulo
Sorry to jump in.
On 2026/9/2 07:19, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org> writes:
>
>> Getting this "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING:" every time on my
>> client PC when I open files on the CIFS share (exported via KSMBD) from
>> my host PC:
>
> The warning is triggered by running the following in
> netfs_alloc_request() with CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y kernels:
>
> rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data);
>
> for the non-writeback path.
>
> @mempool->alloc is set to mempool_alloc_slab(), which calls
> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof() directly and expects the caller to have
> already set current->alloc_tag.
>
> It doesn't occur in the writeback path, however, because we call
> mempool_alloc() macro that wraps to
>
> alloc_hooks(mempool_alloc_noprof(...))
>
> and it sets current->alloc_tag before the allocation.
>
Right - and there's one more instance of the same pattern.
Erhard's second warning (alloc_tag was not set on free) comes from
netfs_folioq_alloc(), which does the same for the folio_queue:
fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data);
When I first saw the report I wondered why no other mempool user trips over this,
so I had a look around the tree:
Everyone else gets their elements through the mempool_alloc() macro, so the tag is
set at their callsite and the callbacks see a valid current->alloc_tag.
I went back to the commit that introduced the raw call, 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in
writeback by adding a mempool") and OK, I think I roughly understand the story now.
Here is my proposed fix patch. I don't have a test environment handy though. What do you think?
diff --git a/fs/netfs/internal.h b/fs/netfs/internal.h
index 420ee7b26580..373be970ec31 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/netfs/internal.h
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ extern mempool_t netfs_request_pool;
extern mempool_t netfs_subrequest_pool;
extern mempool_t netfs_folioq_pool;
+#define mempool_alloc_element(_pool, _gfp) \
+ alloc_hooks((_pool)->alloc(_gfp, (_pool)->pool_data))
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static inline void netfs_proc_add_rreq(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
{
diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c
index 01461a74642d..18f5c64d404e 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/objects.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping,
rreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, gfp);
} else {
- rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data);
+ rreq = mempool_alloc_element(mempool, gfp);
if (!rreq)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ struct netfs_io_subrequest *netfs_alloc_subrequest(struct netfs_io_request *rreq
struct kmem_cache *cache = mempool->pool_data;
if (rreq->gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
- subreq = mempool->alloc(rreq->gfp, mempool->pool_data);
+ subreq = mempool_alloc_element(mempool, rreq->gfp);
else
subreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, rreq->gfp);
if (!subreq)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
index 8c0026836f9c..d1ae6e081664 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct folio_queue *netfs_folioq_alloc(unsigned int rreq_id, gfp_t gfp,
struct folio_queue *fq;
if (gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
- fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data);
+ fq = mempool_alloc_element(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
else
fq = mempool_alloc(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
if (fq) {
--
2.25.1
Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
> I'll look for a possible solution and then let you know.
>
> Thanks for the report.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: client side "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161" at accessing CIFS share
2026-09-16 9:42 ` Hao Ge
@ 2026-09-20 19:08 ` Erhard Furtner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Erhard Furtner @ 2026-09-20 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hao Ge, Paulo Alcantara; +Cc: linux-cifs, David Howells, netfs, linux-kernel
On 9/16/26 11:42, Hao Ge wrote:
> Right - and there's one more instance of the same pattern.
> Erhard's second warning (alloc_tag was not set on free) comes from
> netfs_folioq_alloc(), which does the same for the folio_queue:
>
> fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data);
>
> When I first saw the report I wondered why no other mempool user trips over this,
> so I had a look around the tree:
>
> Everyone else gets their elements through the mempool_alloc() macro, so the tag is
> set at their callsite and the callbacks see a valid current->alloc_tag.
>
> I went back to the commit that introduced the raw call, 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in
> writeback by adding a mempool") and OK, I think I roughly understand the story now.
>
> Here is my proposed fix patch. I don't have a test environment handy though. What do you think?
>
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/internal.h b/fs/netfs/internal.h
> index 420ee7b26580..373be970ec31 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/netfs/internal.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ extern mempool_t netfs_request_pool;
> extern mempool_t netfs_subrequest_pool;
> extern mempool_t netfs_folioq_pool;
>
> +#define mempool_alloc_element(_pool, _gfp) \
> + alloc_hooks((_pool)->alloc(_gfp, (_pool)->pool_data))
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> static inline void netfs_proc_add_rreq(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c
> index 01461a74642d..18f5c64d404e 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> rreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, gfp);
> } else {
> - rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data);
> + rreq = mempool_alloc_element(mempool, gfp);
> if (!rreq)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ struct netfs_io_subrequest *netfs_alloc_subrequest(struct netfs_io_request *rreq
> struct kmem_cache *cache = mempool->pool_data;
>
> if (rreq->gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
> - subreq = mempool->alloc(rreq->gfp, mempool->pool_data);
> + subreq = mempool_alloc_element(mempool, rreq->gfp);
> else
> subreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, rreq->gfp);
> if (!subreq)
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> index 8c0026836f9c..d1ae6e081664 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct folio_queue *netfs_folioq_alloc(unsigned int rreq_id, gfp_t gfp,
> struct folio_queue *fq;
>
> if (gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
> - fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data);
> + fq = mempool_alloc_element(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
> else
> fq = mempool_alloc(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
> if (fq) {
Thanks for your patch Hao! On my side I can confirm it applies on
v7.3-rc3 and fixes "the current->alloc_tag not set WARNING:"
Regards,
Erhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-20 19:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <0b004319-9ef7-437c-a4dd-174d6a9a83db@mailbox.org>
2026-09-01 23:19 ` client side "current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161" at accessing CIFS share Paulo Alcantara
2026-09-16 9:42 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-20 19:08 ` Erhard Furtner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox