From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dakr@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling (v2)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 12:28:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706022812.834677-1-airlied@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This avoids constant need to ioremap when instobjs move at least
on 64-bit systems.
This create the io mapping on first use, because creating it at init
time causes a resource mapping error, because nouveau hasn't kicked
simpledrm off the hardware yet, but ioremap_wc the whole BAR causes
an overlap with BOOTFB/simpledrm. I think the resource system could
do better here, but it's easier to just delay creating the mapping
until first use.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
---
.../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/fbsr.c | 1 +
.../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c | 38 +++++++++++++++----
.../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/priv.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/fbsr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/fbsr.c
index 700cea5def35..f128330f30d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/fbsr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/fbsr.c
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ r535_fbsr = {
static void *
r535_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *imem)
{
+ nv50_instmem_dtor(imem);
kfree(imem->func);
return imem;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
index 6fbaa1e5876d..7314650f6d23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
@@ -30,10 +30,14 @@
#include <subdev/gsp.h>
#include <subdev/mmu.h>
+#include <linux/io-mapping.h>
+
struct nv50_instmem {
struct nvkm_instmem base;
u64 addr;
+ struct io_mapping iomap;
+
/* Mappings that can be evicted when BAR2 space has been exhausted. */
struct list_head lru;
};
@@ -124,7 +128,6 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
struct nv50_instobj *eobj;
struct nvkm_memory *memory = &iobj->base.memory;
struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &imem->base.subdev;
- struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device;
struct nvkm_vma *bar = NULL, *ebar;
u64 size = nvkm_memory_size(memory);
void *emap;
@@ -155,7 +158,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
mutex_unlock(&imem->base.mutex);
if (!eobj)
break;
- iounmap(emap);
+ io_mapping_unmap(emap);
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &ebar);
}
@@ -172,8 +175,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
/* Make the mapping visible to the host. */
iobj->bar = bar;
- iobj->map = ioremap_wc(device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST) +
- (u32)iobj->bar->addr, size);
+ iobj->map = io_mapping_map_wc(&imem->iomap, (u32)iobj->bar->addr, size);
if (!iobj->map) {
nvkm_warn(subdev, "PRAMIN ioremap failed\n");
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &iobj->bar);
@@ -188,6 +190,17 @@ nv50_instobj_map(struct nvkm_memory *memory, u64 offset, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm,
return nvkm_memory_map(memory, offset, vmm, vma, argv, argc);
}
+static void
+check_io_mapping(struct nv50_instmem *imem)
+{
+ if (imem->iomap.size == 0) {
+ struct nvkm_device *device = imem->base.subdev.device;
+ io_mapping_init_wc(&imem->iomap,
+ device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST),
+ device->func->resource_size(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST));
+ }
+}
+
static void
nv50_instobj_release(struct nvkm_memory *memory)
{
@@ -239,7 +252,9 @@ nv50_instobj_acquire(struct nvkm_memory *memory)
/* Attempt to get a direct CPU mapping of the object. */
if ((vmm = nvkm_bar_bar2_vmm(imem->subdev.device))) {
- if (!iobj->map)
+
+ check_io_mapping(iobj->imem);
+ if (!iobj->map && iobj->imem->iomap.size)
nv50_instobj_kmap(iobj, vmm);
map = iobj->map;
}
@@ -277,6 +292,7 @@ nv50_instobj_boot(struct nvkm_memory *memory, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
iobj->lru.next = NULL;
}
+ check_io_mapping(iobj->imem);
nv50_instobj_kmap(iobj, vmm);
nvkm_instmem_boot(imem);
mutex_unlock(&imem->mutex);
@@ -330,7 +346,7 @@ nv50_instobj_dtor(struct nvkm_memory *memory)
if (map) {
struct nvkm_vmm *vmm = nvkm_bar_bar2_vmm(imem->subdev.device);
- iounmap(map);
+ io_mapping_unmap(map);
if (likely(vmm)) /* Can be NULL during BAR destructor. */
nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &bar);
}
@@ -406,10 +422,13 @@ nv50_instmem_fini(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
nv50_instmem(base)->addr = ~0ULL;
}
-static void *
+void *
nv50_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
{
- return nv50_instmem(base);
+ struct nv50_instmem *imem = nv50_instmem(base);
+
+ io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap);
+ return imem;
}
static const struct nvkm_instmem_func
@@ -433,8 +452,11 @@ nv50_instmem_new_(const struct nvkm_instmem_func *func,
if (!(imem = kzalloc_obj(*imem)))
return -ENOMEM;
+
+
nvkm_instmem_ctor(func, device, type, inst, &imem->base);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&imem->lru);
+
*pimem = &imem->base;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/priv.h
index 87bbdd786eaa..b423f01f5fcd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/priv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/priv.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ int nv50_instobj_new(struct nvkm_instmem *, u32 size, u32 align, bool zero,
struct nvkm_memory **);
int nv50_instobj_wrap(struct nvkm_instmem *, struct nvkm_memory *vram,
struct nvkm_memory **bar2);
+void *nv50_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *base);
void nvkm_instmem_ctor(const struct nvkm_instmem_func *, struct nvkm_device *,
enum nvkm_subdev_type, int, struct nvkm_instmem *);
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706022812.834677-1-airlied@gmail.com \
--to=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox