From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: bound sync and op counts in EXEC and VM_BIND
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 11:07:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e433e8d-a71e-49e4-8dea-659a94c8143f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9txG6wEwx_L5RsB+3gEuT6dYJQvrPpQnHHF4V1gFZpWNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/11/26 6:05 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 at 14:00, Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 08:43:50AM +1000, David Airlie wrote:
>>> Have you run a complete Vulkan CTS with NVK across this with no regressions?
>>>
>>> I'm weary of those limits being too low, but I think the only app that
>>> might push them beyond CTS would be Forza Horizon 5 or 6.
>>
>> No, I have not. I don't currently have the hardware to run NVK, so I can't
>> offer a CTS run or any other regression test for this.
>>
>> Is there a better guard that avoids a hard limit here, or does this need
>> a test before it can go in?
>
> Looking at xe it also has 1024 limit on number of syncs, but it
> doesn't have any limit on number of binds,
>
> *bind_ops = kvmalloc_objs(struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op,
> args->num_binds,
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT |
> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
>
> Maybe nouveau could do the same.
SGTM, I'd also be hesitant to put a hard limit on VM_BIND.
@Junrui: Can you please resend?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 11:14 [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: fix unbounded kernel allocations in the VM_BIND uAPI Junrui Luo via B4 Relay
2026-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: bound sync and op counts in EXEC and VM_BIND Junrui Luo via B4 Relay
2026-08-09 22:43 ` David Airlie
2026-08-11 4:00 ` Junrui Luo
2026-08-11 4:05 ` Dave Airlie
2026-09-01 9:07 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/nouveau/uvmm: reject a second VM_INIT Junrui Luo via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e433e8d-a71e-49e4-8dea-659a94c8143f@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox