From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Cc: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <ojeda@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:27:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM9QI47QSJ0L.2QMRVD4AP5WIV@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-178822@kernel.org>
On Tue Oct 20, 2026 at 7:18 PM JST, sashiko-bot wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] gpu: nova-core: unintended 1ms sleep in CmdqInner::drain() on empty queue
> --
>
> commit c3321749b8f493965661eed66b6e6bf889cebd66
> Author: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>
> gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain
>
> This commit refactors CmdqInner::drain() to use consume_element() and
> adds a log() helper method to GspParsedMessage.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs
>> index 7db3d28e8902c..54e87fd7158cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -1054,21 +1063,14 @@ fn await_msg<M: MessageFromGsp>(&mut self) -> Result<M>
>> /// `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation, or if a message's page count
>> /// overflows a `u32`.
>> fn drain(&mut self) -> Result {
>> - while !self.gsp_mem.driver_read_area().0.is_empty() {
>> - // A message is available, so this returns without waiting.
>> - let msg = self.wait_for_msg(Delta::ZERO)?;
>> -
>> - let pages =
>> - u32::try_from(msg.header.msg_length().div_ceil(GSP_PAGE_SIZE)).map_err(|_| {
>> - dev_err!(&self.dev, "GSP drain: message length overflow\n");
>> - EIO
>> - })?;
>> -
>> - RpcMessage::parse(self.dev, msg)?.log(self.dev);
>> -
>> - self.gsp_mem.advance_cpu_read_ptr(pages);
>> + loop {
>> + match self.consume_element(Delta::ZERO, |message| message.log(self.dev)) {
>> + Ok(()) => (),
>> + // No more message pending on the queue, drain is complete.
>> + Err(ETIMEDOUT) => return Ok(()),
>> + // Other errors are fatal, and stall the queue.
>> + Err(e) => return Err(e),
>> + }
>> }
>> -
>> - Ok(())
>> }
>> }
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can removing the !self.gsp_mem.driver_read_area().0.is_empty() check
> cause CmdqInner::drain() to sleep for 1 ms when the queue is empty?
>
> Previously, CmdqInner::drain() only called wait_for_msg(Delta::ZERO)
> after confirming a message was available in driver_read_area(). With the
> new loop, consume_element(Delta::ZERO, ...) is called until the queue is
> empty, which invokes wait_for_msg(Delta::ZERO):
>
> drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs:CmdqInner::wait_for_msg()
> let (slice_1, slice_2) = read_poll_timeout(
> || Ok(self.gsp_mem.driver_read_area()),
> |driver_area| !driver_area.0.is_empty(),
> Delta::from_millis(1),
> timeout,
> )
>
> In rust/kernel/io/poll.rs:read_poll_timeout(), when the condition is
> false, the timeout check uses a strict greater-than comparison:
>
> if start.elapsed() > timeout_delta {
> // Unlike the C version, we immediately return.
> // We have just called `op()` so we don't need to call it again.
> return Err(ETIMEDOUT);
> }
>
> if !sleep_delta.is_zero() {
> fsleep(sleep_delta);
> }
>
> Because op() only reads two u32 indices from coherent memory in RAM, if
> the monotonic clock has not advanced by at least 1 ns between
> Instant::now() and start.elapsed() (for instance on architectures with
> coarser timer resolution or under virtualization), start.elapsed() is
> Delta::ZERO. Since Delta::ZERO > Delta::ZERO is false,
> read_poll_timeout() falls through to fsleep(Delta::from_millis(1)) while
> holding the Cmdq mutex (in paths like GspInterrupt::handle_threaded() ->
> Cmdq::drain() and Gpu::new() -> Cmdq::drain()).
>
> Would it make sense to keep the while
> !self.gsp_mem.driver_read_area().0.is_empty() loop condition around
> self.consume_element(Delta::ZERO, |message| message.log(self.dev))?
Mmm, that's an interesting one, in that I am not sure there are any
concrete implications but I'd like to fix it anyway.
I was thinking that maybe we should add a special-case to
`read_poll_timeout` so it returns unconditionally after checking the
condition once if `timeout_delta == Delta::ZERO`, but doing so would
make the `sleep_delta` argument moot so I guess that's not adequate (and
the current behavior is technically correct). So I think I'll
special-case nova-core's `wait_for_msg` instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 10:08 [PATCH v5 00/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: prepare the command queue for r000 dual-message types Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: remove stale comment Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: simplify framing error description Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: introduce and use proper RpcMessageHeader type Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: group the RPC-specific part of send_single_command Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the send path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split RPC parsing part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move RPC message logging to RpcMessage Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: extract await_msg_with from await_msg Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:27 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: move the RPC commands " Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add `rpc` to RPC message send/receive methods Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM9QI47QSJ0L.2QMRVD4AP5WIV@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox