* [PATCH] NTB: amd: Silence shift wrapping warning in amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
@ 2019-03-25 9:23 Dan Carpenter
2019-03-26 5:46 ` S-k, Shyam-sundar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2019-03-25 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shyam Sundar S K
Cc: Jon Mason, Dave Jiang, Allen Hubbe, linux-ntb, kernel-janitors
This code triggers a Smatch warning:
drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c:336 amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
warn: should '(1 << db_vector)' be a 64 bit type?
I don't think "db_vector" can be higher than 16 so this doesn't affect
runtime, but it's nice to silence the static checker warning and we
might increase "ndev->db_count" in the future.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c
index 16c10dfe0919..84aec5500df3 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static u64 amd_ntb_db_vector_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int db_vector)
if (db_vector < 0 || db_vector > ndev->db_count)
return 0;
- return ntb_ndev(ntb)->db_valid_mask & (1 << db_vector);
+ return ntb_ndev(ntb)->db_valid_mask & (1ULL << db_vector);
}
static u64 amd_ntb_db_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] NTB: amd: Silence shift wrapping warning in amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
2019-03-25 9:23 [PATCH] NTB: amd: Silence shift wrapping warning in amd_ntb_db_vector_mask() Dan Carpenter
@ 2019-03-26 5:46 ` S-k, Shyam-sundar
2019-06-13 13:26 ` Jon Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: S-k, Shyam-sundar @ 2019-03-26 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Jon Mason, Dave Jiang, Allen Hubbe, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
On 3/25/2019 2:53 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This code triggers a Smatch warning:
>
> drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c:336 amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
> warn: should '(1 << db_vector)' be a 64 bit type?
>
> I don't think "db_vector" can be higher than 16 so this doesn't affect
> runtime, but it's nice to silence the static checker warning and we
> might increase "ndev->db_count" in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NTB: amd: Silence shift wrapping warning in amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
2019-03-26 5:46 ` S-k, Shyam-sundar
@ 2019-06-13 13:26 ` Jon Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Mason @ 2019-06-13 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: S-k, Shyam-sundar
Cc: Dan Carpenter, Dave Jiang, Allen Hubbe,
linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:46:44AM +0000, S-k, Shyam-sundar wrote:
> On 3/25/2019 2:53 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This code triggers a Smatch warning:
> >
> > drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c:336 amd_ntb_db_vector_mask()
> > warn: should '(1 << db_vector)' be a 64 bit type?
> >
> > I don't think "db_vector" can be higher than 16 so this doesn't affect
> > runtime, but it's nice to silence the static checker warning and we
> > might increase "ndev->db_count" in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Sorry for the delay. The patch is now in the ntb branch. We've
missed window for 5.2, but it will be in the 5.3 pull request.
Thanks,
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-13 13:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-25 9:23 [PATCH] NTB: amd: Silence shift wrapping warning in amd_ntb_db_vector_mask() Dan Carpenter
2019-03-26 5:46 ` S-k, Shyam-sundar
2019-06-13 13:26 ` Jon Mason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox