* [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test @ 2026-06-24 14:00 Richard Cheng 2026-06-30 18:30 ` Alison Schofield 2026-07-14 19:28 ` Alison Schofield 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Cheng @ 2026-06-24 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dave, jic23, dave.jiang, alison.schofield, vishal.l.verma, djbw, danwilliams, nvdimm Cc: iweiny, ming.li, kobak, kaihengf, kees, newtonl, kristinc, mochs, linux-cxl, linux-kernel, Richard Cheng Add a negative case to the CXL fwctl test that issues a Get Feature FWCTL_RPC with out_len == offset(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload) and a non-zero count. The kernel must reject this with -EINVAL instead of writing the feature payload past the rpc_out buffer. This is the userspace regression test for corresponding kernel fix [1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624134737.49166-1-icheng@nvidia.com/ Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com> --- test/fwctl.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/fwctl.c b/test/fwctl.c index 979c1a6..69d0048 100644 --- a/test/fwctl.c +++ b/test/fwctl.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <endian.h> #include <stdint.h> +#include <stddef.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <syslog.h> #include <string.h> @@ -207,6 +208,45 @@ out: return rc; } +static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) +{ + struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in; + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *out; + size_t out_size, in_size; + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *in; + struct fwctl_rpc *rpc; + int rc; + + in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in); + /* header only => zero payload room */ + out_size = offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload); + + rpc = get_prepped_command(in_size, out_size, + CXL_MBOX_OPCODE_GET_FEATURE); + if (!rpc) + return -ENXIO; + + in = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *)rpc->in; + out = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *)rpc->out; + + feat_in = &in->get_feat_in; + uuid_copy(feat_in->uuid, feat_ctx->uuid); + /* non-zero count that exceeds the zero payload room */ + feat_in->count = feat_ctx->get_size; + + rc = send_command(fd, rpc, out); + free_rpc(rpc); + + if (rc == -EINVAL) + return 0; + if (rc == 0) { + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature with undersized out_len was not rejected\n"); + return -ENXIO; + } + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature OOB rejection test: unexpected rc %d\n", rc); + return rc; +} + static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_test_feature(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) { struct cxl_mbox_set_feat_in *feat_in; @@ -393,6 +433,12 @@ static int test_fwctl_features(struct cxl_memdev *memdev) goto out; } + rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(fd, &feat_ctx); + if (rc) { + fprintf(stderr, "Failed Get Feature OOB rejection test: %d\n", rc); + goto out; + } + out: close(fd); return rc; base-commit: 8ad90e54f0ff4f7291e7f21d44d769d10f24e2b6 -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test 2026-06-24 14:00 [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test Richard Cheng @ 2026-06-30 18:30 ` Alison Schofield 2026-07-14 19:28 ` Alison Schofield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Alison Schofield @ 2026-06-30 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Cheng Cc: dave, jic23, dave.jiang, vishal.l.verma, djbw, danwilliams, nvdimm, iweiny, ming.li, kobak, kaihengf, kees, newtonl, kristinc, mochs, linux-cxl, linux-kernel On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:00:06PM +0800, Richard Cheng wrote: > Add a negative case to the CXL fwctl test that issues a Get Feature > FWCTL_RPC with out_len == offset(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload) and > a non-zero count. The kernel must reject this with -EINVAL instead of > writing the feature payload past the rpc_out buffer. > > This is the userspace regression test for corresponding kernel fix [1]. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624134737.49166-1-icheng@nvidia.com/ > Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com> Thanks Richard! In the unit tests when we have cases that depend on a specific kernel fix landing we prefer to gate on that kver. This is a first though, because the gate needs to be within the C program not simply using the check_min_kver helper as is done for the test shell scripts. I think something like appended would be useful here. See if that works for you. I only tested without the fix to confirm it fails the entire fwctl test. I also stopped short of testing with the fix because I see another patchset in flight grouping bounds checks and figure you will come back around and update this test patch similarly. diff --git a/test/fwctl.c b/test/fwctl.c index 69d0048c09df..b18a4f10717b 100644 --- a/test/fwctl.c +++ b/test/fwctl.c @@ -6,10 +6,12 @@ #include <endian.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <stddef.h> +#include <stdbool.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <syslog.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> +#include <sys/utsname.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <cxl/libcxl.h> #include <linux/uuid.h> @@ -21,6 +23,37 @@ static const char provider[] = "cxl_test"; +/* Running kernel version parsed once in main(). */ +static unsigned int kver_major; +static unsigned int kver_minor; + +/* + * kver_ge - is the running kernel at least major.minor? + * + * The C version of the shell suite's check_min_kver helper. + * Test cases for fixes tied to a specific kver, gate here so that test + * cases quietly skip rather than fail on kernels that predate the fix. + * Acknowledging that doesn't help testing of backports. + */ +static bool kver_ge(unsigned int major, unsigned int minor) +{ + if (kver_major != major) + return kver_major > major; + return kver_minor >= minor; +} + +static void parse_kver(void) +{ + struct utsname uts; + + if (uname(&uts) == 0 && + sscanf(uts.release, "%u.%u", &kver_major, &kver_minor) == 2) + return; + + kver_major = 0; + kver_minor = 0; +} + UUID_DEFINE(test_uuid, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, @@ -208,6 +241,10 @@ out: return rc; } +/* First kernel release with the Get Feature OOB rejection fix */ +#define GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MAJOR 7 +#define GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MINOR 3 + static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) { struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in; @@ -217,6 +254,13 @@ static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) struct fwctl_rpc *rpc; int rc; + if (!kver_ge(GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MAJOR, GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MINOR)) { + fprintf(stderr, + "skip: Get Feature OOB rejection test needs kernel >= %u.%u\n", + GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MAJOR, GET_FEAT_OOB_FIX_MINOR); + return 0; + } + in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in); /* header only => zero payload room */ out_size = offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload); @@ -463,6 +507,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) struct cxl_bus *bus; int rc; + parse_kver(); + rc = cxl_new(&ctx); if (rc < 0) return rc; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test 2026-06-24 14:00 [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test Richard Cheng 2026-06-30 18:30 ` Alison Schofield @ 2026-07-14 19:28 ` Alison Schofield 2026-07-16 4:08 ` Richard Cheng 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alison Schofield @ 2026-07-14 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Cheng Cc: dave, jic23, dave.jiang, vishal.l.verma, djbw, danwilliams, nvdimm, iweiny, ming.li, kobak, kaihengf, kees, newtonl, kristinc, mochs, linux-cxl, linux-kernel On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:00:06PM +0800, Richard Cheng wrote: > Add a negative case to the CXL fwctl test that issues a Get Feature > FWCTL_RPC with out_len == offset(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload) and > a non-zero count. The kernel must reject this with -EINVAL instead of > writing the feature payload past the rpc_out buffer. > > This is the userspace regression test for corresponding kernel fix [1]. Hi Richard, I just finished reviewing the now 3 piece series[2], that [1] is now a piece of. One suggestion on top of the kver gating suggested in prior response is to add a companion negative case for the Set Feature bounds fix in the same series. Same shape as this one, ie build a normal Set Feature RPC, set out_len to 0, expect -EINVAL. It's a stronger backstop than the Get case, too because before the fix an out_len of 0 makes kvzalloc() return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which passes the !rpc_out check, and the header write then oopses rather than just returning a wrong status. Gate it on the same kver helper. I'm stopping short of suggesting a test for the third patch (the Get Feature per-iteration clamp). That one looks like it needs a multi-transfer feature and a device that over returns on the last chunk, neither possible without a cxl_test mock change. -- Alison > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624134737.49166-1-icheng@nvidia.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260626104102.53892-1-icheng@nvidia.com/#r > Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com> > --- > test/fwctl.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/test/fwctl.c b/test/fwctl.c > index 979c1a6..69d0048 100644 > --- a/test/fwctl.c > +++ b/test/fwctl.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > #include <stdio.h> > #include <endian.h> > #include <stdint.h> > +#include <stddef.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <syslog.h> > #include <string.h> > @@ -207,6 +208,45 @@ out: > return rc; > } > > +static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) > +{ > + struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in; > + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *out; > + size_t out_size, in_size; > + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *in; > + struct fwctl_rpc *rpc; > + int rc; > + > + in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in); > + /* header only => zero payload room */ > + out_size = offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload); > + > + rpc = get_prepped_command(in_size, out_size, > + CXL_MBOX_OPCODE_GET_FEATURE); > + if (!rpc) > + return -ENXIO; > + > + in = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *)rpc->in; > + out = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *)rpc->out; > + > + feat_in = &in->get_feat_in; > + uuid_copy(feat_in->uuid, feat_ctx->uuid); > + /* non-zero count that exceeds the zero payload room */ > + feat_in->count = feat_ctx->get_size; > + > + rc = send_command(fd, rpc, out); > + free_rpc(rpc); > + > + if (rc == -EINVAL) > + return 0; > + if (rc == 0) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature with undersized out_len was not rejected\n"); > + return -ENXIO; > + } > + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature OOB rejection test: unexpected rc %d\n", rc); > + return rc; > +} > + > static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_test_feature(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) > { > struct cxl_mbox_set_feat_in *feat_in; > @@ -393,6 +433,12 @@ static int test_fwctl_features(struct cxl_memdev *memdev) > goto out; > } > > + rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(fd, &feat_ctx); > + if (rc) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed Get Feature OOB rejection test: %d\n", rc); > + goto out; > + } > + > out: > close(fd); > return rc; > > base-commit: 8ad90e54f0ff4f7291e7f21d44d769d10f24e2b6 > -- > 2.43.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test 2026-07-14 19:28 ` Alison Schofield @ 2026-07-16 4:08 ` Richard Cheng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Cheng @ 2026-07-16 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alison Schofield Cc: dave, jic23, dave.jiang, vishal.l.verma, djbw, danwilliams, nvdimm, iweiny, ming.li, kobak, kaihengf, kees, newtonl, kristinc, mochs, linux-cxl, linux-kernel On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 12:28:28PM +0800, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:00:06PM +0800, Richard Cheng wrote: > > Add a negative case to the CXL fwctl test that issues a Get Feature > > FWCTL_RPC with out_len == offset(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload) and > > a non-zero count. The kernel must reject this with -EINVAL instead of > > writing the feature payload past the rpc_out buffer. > > > > This is the userspace regression test for corresponding kernel fix [1]. > > Hi Richard, > > I just finished reviewing the now 3 piece series[2], that [1] is now > a piece of. > > One suggestion on top of the kver gating suggested in prior response > is to add a companion negative case for the Set Feature bounds fix > in the same series. Same shape as this one, ie build a normal Set > Feature RPC, set out_len to 0, expect -EINVAL. It's a stronger backstop > than the Get case, too because before the fix an out_len of 0 makes > kvzalloc() return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which passes the !rpc_out check, and > the header write then oopses rather than just returning a wrong status. > Gate it on the same kver helper. > > I'm stopping short of suggesting a test for the third patch (the Get > Feature per-iteration clamp). That one looks like it needs a > multi-transfer feature and a device that over returns on the last chunk, > neither possible without a cxl_test mock change. > > -- Alison > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624134737.49166-1-icheng@nvidia.com/ > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260626104102.53892-1-icheng@nvidia.com/#r > > Hi Alison, Thanks for the review. I'll update the ndctl patch to add kernel-version check and a Set Feature negative test with "out_len=0" I'll use the same version check for both tsets and send a new version for it. As for the Get Feature per-iteration clamp, I'll also work on extending cxl_test with the required mock behavior. I'll send the cxl_test change and its regression test as follow-up patches. --Richard > > Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com> > > --- > > test/fwctl.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/test/fwctl.c b/test/fwctl.c > > index 979c1a6..69d0048 100644 > > --- a/test/fwctl.c > > +++ b/test/fwctl.c > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include <stdio.h> > > #include <endian.h> > > #include <stdint.h> > > +#include <stddef.h> > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <syslog.h> > > #include <string.h> > > @@ -207,6 +208,45 @@ out: > > return rc; > > } > > > > +static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) > > +{ > > + struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in; > > + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *out; > > + size_t out_size, in_size; > > + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *in; > > + struct fwctl_rpc *rpc; > > + int rc; > > + > > + in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in); > > + /* header only => zero payload room */ > > + out_size = offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload); > > + > > + rpc = get_prepped_command(in_size, out_size, > > + CXL_MBOX_OPCODE_GET_FEATURE); > > + if (!rpc) > > + return -ENXIO; > > + > > + in = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *)rpc->in; > > + out = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *)rpc->out; > > + > > + feat_in = &in->get_feat_in; > > + uuid_copy(feat_in->uuid, feat_ctx->uuid); > > + /* non-zero count that exceeds the zero payload room */ > > + feat_in->count = feat_ctx->get_size; > > + > > + rc = send_command(fd, rpc, out); > > + free_rpc(rpc); > > + > > + if (rc == -EINVAL) > > + return 0; > > + if (rc == 0) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature with undersized out_len was not rejected\n"); > > + return -ENXIO; > > + } > > + fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature OOB rejection test: unexpected rc %d\n", rc); > > + return rc; > > +} > > + > > static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_test_feature(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx) > > { > > struct cxl_mbox_set_feat_in *feat_in; > > @@ -393,6 +433,12 @@ static int test_fwctl_features(struct cxl_memdev *memdev) > > goto out; > > } > > > > + rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(fd, &feat_ctx); > > + if (rc) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed Get Feature OOB rejection test: %d\n", rc); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > out: > > close(fd); > > return rc; > > > > base-commit: 8ad90e54f0ff4f7291e7f21d44d769d10f24e2b6 > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-16 4:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-06-24 14:00 [ndctl PATCH] test/fwctl: Add Get Feature OOB rejection regression test Richard Cheng 2026-06-30 18:30 ` Alison Schofield 2026-07-14 19:28 ` Alison Schofield 2026-07-16 4:08 ` Richard Cheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox