From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/6] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v4
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:04:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018130455.4b4dc370a7bbc6da235afb82@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018144449.GA4568@shrek.lan>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:44:54 -0500 Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> wrote:
> This is an effort of removing ocfs2_controld.pcmk and getting ocfs2 DLM
> handling up to the times with respect to DLM (>=4.0.1) and corosync
> (2.3.x). AFAIK, cman also is being phased out for a unified corosync
> cluster stack.
>
> fs/dlm performs all the functions with respect to fencing and node
> management and provides the API's to do so for ocfs2. For all future
> references, DLM stands for fs/dlm code.
>
> The advantages are:
> + No need to run an additional userspace daemon (ocfs2_controld)
> + No contrrold devince handling and controld protocol
> + Shifting responsibilities of node management to DLM layer
>
> For backward compatibility, we are keeping the controld handling code. Once
> enough time has passed we can remove a significant portion of the code.
>
> This feature requires modification in the userspace ocfs2-tools.
> The changes can be found at:
> https://github.com/goldwynr/ocfs2-tools branch: nocontrold
> Currently, not many checks are present in the userspace code,
> but that would change soon.
>
> These changes were developed on linux-stable 3.11.y. However, the
> changes are applicable to the current upstream as well. If you wish
> to give the entire kernel a spin, the link is:
>
> https://github.com/goldwynr/linux-stable branch: nocontrold
I queued this up so it will get some linux-next exposure when Stephen
gets back to his desk. But I don't feel I can take it further without
suitable input from the other ocfs2 developers (please).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 14:44 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/6] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v4 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-10-18 20:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-10-18 23:06 ` Joel Becker
2013-10-31 13:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-11-04 0:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-11-04 0:49 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-11-04 3:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-11-04 22:08 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131018130455.4b4dc370a7bbc6da235afb82@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox