From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/6] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v4
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:48:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527718F7.4030104@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104004949.GJ29346@wotan.suse.de>
On 11/03/2013 06:49 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:44:54AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an effort of removing ocfs2_controld.pcmk and getting ocfs2 DLM
>> handling up to the times with respect to DLM (>=4.0.1) and corosync
>> (2.3.x). AFAIK, cman also is being phased out for a unified corosync
>> cluster stack.
>
> Thanks again for doing this work. I'm about halfway done with the patches
> when I write this but things seem to be coming along well.
>
>
>> fs/dlm performs all the functions with respect to fencing and node
>> management and provides the API's to do so for ocfs2. For all future
>> references, DLM stands for fs/dlm code.
>>
>> The advantages are:
>> + No need to run an additional userspace daemon (ocfs2_controld)
>> + No contrrold devince handling and controld protocol
>> + Shifting responsibilities of node management to DLM layer
>>
>> For backward compatibility, we are keeping the controld handling code. Once
>> enough time has passed we can remove a significant portion of the code.
>
> Can you give us some brief details on how backwards compatibility was
> tested? I have a feeling that it would alleviate some concerns we had about
> that when the 1st series hit ocfs2-devel.
I ran the code with an unmodified ocfs2-tools/libdlm and it worked fine
and I got the expected message of upgrading dlm/ocfs2-tools.
I checked the reverse (older kernel, newer tools) as well, and mount
returned ESRCH because ocfs2_controld was not running.
--
Goldwyn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-04 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 14:44 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/6] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v4 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-10-18 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-18 23:06 ` Joel Becker
2013-10-31 13:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-11-04 0:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-11-04 0:49 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-11-04 3:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2013-11-04 22:08 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527718F7.4030104@suse.de \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox