* [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report
@ 2010-09-21 17:12 Petteri Tikander
2010-09-21 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] unit: add fuzzy address check to test-sms Petteri Tikander
2010-09-22 21:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Denis Kenzior
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Tikander @ 2010-09-21 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ofono
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4838 bytes --]
---
src/smsutil.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/smsutil.c b/src/smsutil.c
index cd0fef2..8b05c68 100644
--- a/src/smsutil.c
+++ b/src/smsutil.c
@@ -2858,35 +2858,104 @@ gboolean status_report_assembly_report(struct status_report_assembly *assembly,
unsigned int offset = status_report->status_report.mr / 32;
unsigned int bit = 1 << (status_report->status_report.mr % 32);
struct id_table_node *node = NULL;
- const char *straddr;
+ const char *r_addr, *s_addr;
+ struct sms_address addr;
GHashTable *id_table;
gpointer key, value;
gboolean delivered;
- GHashTableIter iter;
+ GHashTableIter iter_addr, iter;
gboolean pending;
int i;
unsigned char *msgid;
+ unsigned int len, r_len, s_len;
/* We ignore temporary or tempfinal status reports */
if (sr_st_to_delivered(status_report->status_report.st,
&delivered) == FALSE)
return FALSE;
- straddr = sms_address_to_string(&status_report->status_report.raddr);
- id_table = g_hash_table_lookup(assembly->assembly_table, straddr);
+ r_addr = sms_address_to_string(&status_report->status_report.raddr);
+ id_table = g_hash_table_lookup(assembly->assembly_table, r_addr);
- /* key (receiver address) does not exist in assembly */
- if (id_table == NULL)
- return FALSE;
+ /* key (receiver address) exists in assembly */
+ if (id_table != NULL) {
- g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, id_table);
- while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value)) {
- node = value;
+ /* Found an identical address from assembly. */
+ s_addr = r_addr;
- if (node->mrs[offset] & bit)
- break;
+ g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, id_table);
+ while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value)) {
+ node = value;
+
+ if (node->mrs[offset] & bit)
+ break;
- node = NULL;
+ node = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ /*
+ * Key (receiver address) does not exist in assembly.
+ * Some networks can change address to international format,
+ * although address is sent in the national format.
+ * Handle also change from national to international format.
+ * So notify these special cases by comparing only
+ * last six digits of the assembly addresses and received address.
+ * If address contains less than six digits,
+ * compare only existing digits.
+ */
+ else {
+ g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter_addr, assembly->assembly_table);
+
+ /*
+ * Go through all addresses using 'fuzzy' address-comparation.
+ * Each address can relate to 1-n msg_ids.
+ */
+ while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter_addr, (gpointer) &s_addr,
+ (gpointer) &id_table)) {
+
+ /* Notify international <-> national conversions */
+ if (((r_addr[0] == '+') && (s_addr[0] != '+')) ||
+ ((r_addr[0] != '+') && (s_addr[0] == '+'))) {
+
+ r_len = strlen(r_addr);
+ s_len = strlen(s_addr);
+
+ len = MIN(6, MIN(r_len, s_len));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (s_addr[s_len - i - 1] !=
+ r_addr[r_len - i - 1])
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Not all digits matched. */
+ if (i < len)
+ continue;
+ }
+ /* No conversions */
+ else
+ continue;
+
+ /* Address matched. Check message reference. */
+ g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, id_table);
+ while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value)) {
+ node = value;
+
+ /* Address and MR matched */
+ if (node->mrs[offset] & bit)
+ break;
+
+ node = NULL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Received address with MR matched with one
+ * of the stored addresses and MR, so no need
+ * to continue searching.
+ */
+ if (node)
+ break;
+ }
}
/* Unable to find a message reference belonging to this address */
@@ -2913,13 +2982,15 @@ gboolean status_report_assembly_report(struct status_report_assembly *assembly,
msgid = (unsigned char *) key;
+ sms_address_from_string(&addr, s_addr);
+
if (pending == TRUE && node->deliverable == TRUE) {
/*
* More status reports expected, and already received
* reports completed. Update backup file.
*/
sr_assembly_add_fragment_backup(assembly->imsi, node,
- &status_report->status_report.raddr,
+ &addr,
msgid);
return FALSE;
@@ -2932,14 +3003,14 @@ gboolean status_report_assembly_report(struct status_report_assembly *assembly,
memcpy(out_msgid, msgid, SMS_MSGID_LEN);
sr_assembly_remove_fragment_backup(assembly->imsi,
- &status_report->status_report.raddr,
+ &addr,
msgid);
g_hash_table_iter_remove(&iter);
if (g_hash_table_size(id_table) == 0)
g_hash_table_remove(assembly->assembly_table,
- status_report->status_report.raddr.address);
+ s_addr);
return TRUE;
}
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/2] unit: add fuzzy address check to test-sms
2010-09-21 17:12 [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Petteri Tikander
@ 2010-09-21 17:12 ` Petteri Tikander
2010-09-22 21:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Denis Kenzior
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Tikander @ 2010-09-21 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ofono
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3069 bytes --]
---
unit/test-sms.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/unit/test-sms.c b/unit/test-sms.c
index d7a1b4d..f0089e0 100644
--- a/unit/test-sms.c
+++ b/unit/test-sms.c
@@ -1273,8 +1273,11 @@ static void test_sr_assembly()
"940A00";
const char *sr_pdu2 = "06050D91945152991136F00160124130640A0160124130"
"450A00";
+ const char *sr_pdu3 = "0606098121436587F9019012413064A0019012413045A0"
+ "00";
struct sms sr1;
struct sms sr2;
+ struct sms sr3;
unsigned char pdu[176];
long pdu_len;
struct status_report_assembly *sra;
@@ -1285,7 +1288,7 @@ static void test_sr_assembly()
16, 17, 18, 19 };
unsigned char id[SMS_MSGID_LEN];
- /* mr 4 & mr 5 */
+ /* international address, mr 4 & mr 5 */
decode_hex_own_buf(sr_pdu1, -1, &pdu_len, 0, pdu);
g_assert(sms_decode(pdu, pdu_len, FALSE, 26, &sr1) == TRUE);
@@ -1293,6 +1296,11 @@ static void test_sr_assembly()
decode_hex_own_buf(sr_pdu2, -1, &pdu_len, 0, pdu);
g_assert(sms_decode(pdu, pdu_len, FALSE, 26, &sr2) == TRUE);
+ /* national address, mr 6 */
+
+ decode_hex_own_buf(sr_pdu3, -1, &pdu_len, 0, pdu);
+ g_assert(sms_decode(pdu, pdu_len, FALSE, 24, &sr3) == TRUE);
+
g_print("sr1 address: %s, mr: %d\n",
sms_address_to_string(&sr1.status_report.raddr),
sr1.status_report.mr);
@@ -1301,6 +1309,10 @@ static void test_sr_assembly()
sms_address_to_string(&sr2.status_report.raddr),
sr2.status_report.mr);
+ g_print("sr3 address: %s, mr: %d\n",
+ sms_address_to_string(&sr3.status_report.raddr),
+ sr3.status_report.mr);
+
sms_address_from_string(&addr, "+4915259911630");
sra = status_report_assembly_new(NULL);
@@ -1319,6 +1331,35 @@ static void test_sr_assembly()
g_assert(memcmp(id, sha1, SMS_MSGID_LEN) == 0);
g_assert(delivered == TRUE);
+
+ /*
+ * Send sms-message in the national address-format,
+ * but receive in the international address-format.
+ */
+ sms_address_from_string(&addr, "9911630");
+ status_report_assembly_add_fragment(sra, sha1, &addr, 4, time(NULL), 2);
+ status_report_assembly_add_fragment(sra, sha1, &addr, 5, time(NULL), 2);
+
+ g_assert(!status_report_assembly_report(sra, &sr1, id, &delivered));
+ g_assert(status_report_assembly_report(sra, &sr2, id, &delivered));
+
+ g_assert(memcmp(id, sha1, SMS_MSGID_LEN) == 0);
+ g_assert(delivered == TRUE);
+ g_assert(g_hash_table_size(sra->assembly_table) == 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Send sms-message in the international address-format,
+ * but receive in the national address-format.
+ */
+ sms_address_from_string(&addr, "+358123456789");
+ status_report_assembly_add_fragment(sra, sha1, &addr, 6, time(NULL), 1);
+
+ g_assert(status_report_assembly_report(sra, &sr3, id, &delivered));
+
+ g_assert(memcmp(id, sha1, SMS_MSGID_LEN) == 0);
+ g_assert(delivered == TRUE);
+ g_assert(g_hash_table_size(sra->assembly_table) == 0);
+
status_report_assembly_free(sra);
}
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report
2010-09-21 17:12 [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Petteri Tikander
2010-09-21 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] unit: add fuzzy address check to test-sms Petteri Tikander
@ 2010-09-22 21:33 ` Denis Kenzior
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kenzior @ 2010-09-22 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ofono
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]
On 09/21/2010 12:12 PM, Petteri Tikander wrote:
> ---
> src/smsutil.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Both patches have been applied, thanks! I reflowed the first patch a
bit just to make it a little easier to follow.
I've also marked the status report task as done.
Thanks,
-Denis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-22 21:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-21 17:12 [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Petteri Tikander
2010-09-21 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] unit: add fuzzy address check to test-sms Petteri Tikander
2010-09-22 21:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] smsutil: add fuzzy address check for status report Denis Kenzior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox