From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] voice call API changes (proposal)
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:32:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49790C.4010807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D490D17.3040405@nokia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1621 bytes --]
Hi Andras,
On 02/02/2011 01:51 AM, Andras Domokos wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> On 02/01/2011 05:54 PM, ext Denis Kenzior wrote:
>> Hi Andras,
>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + boolean Forwarded
>>>>> +
>>>>> + Contains the indication whether the voice call is a
>>>>> + forwarded call or not.
>>>>> +
>>>> So just to clarify, this is usually set on a local Incoming / Waiting
>>>> call, correct?
>>> This property would apply to both, outgoing and incoming calls.
>>>
>>> When the incoming call is a forwarded call the call is accompanied
>>> by a "forwarded call" SS notification.
>>>
>>> When the call is an outgoing call and the call is forwarded due to the
>>> remote party having a conditional or unconditional forwarding enabled,
>>> the outgoing call is accompanied by a "call has been forwarded"
>>> SS notification.
>>>
>>> I think would be a good idea, if not mandatory, to have a voice call
>>> property indicating the call direction.
>> So why do we need the below two signals if the Forwarded property
>> applies to both incoming and outgoing calls?
> These are optional in fact, let's ignore them for now.
> What about the rest, are we OK now?
I don't really like this Forwarded property. I think we should really
break up the indications between the Incoming and Outgoing states. If
you want Forwarded as a property, then treat it as incoming calls only
and keep the two signals for the outgoing conditions.
Please re-send the entire proposal with all the feedback and extra
documentation integrated in so we can have another look.
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1296474033.git.Andras.Domokos@nokia.com>
2011-01-31 11:56 ` [RFC] voice call API changes (proposal) Andras Domokos
2011-01-31 19:58 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-01 15:43 ` Andras Domokos
2011-02-01 15:54 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-02 7:51 ` Andras Domokos
2011-02-02 15:32 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2011-02-02 18:16 ` [RFC] voicecall API changes (proposal 2) Andras Domokos
2011-02-02 20:01 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-03 10:53 ` Andras Domokos
2011-02-03 16:29 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-07 11:18 ` [RFC] voicecall API changes (proposal v3) Andras Domokos
2011-02-07 16:38 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-07 17:07 ` Andras Domokos
2011-02-07 17:09 ` Andras Domokos
2011-02-07 19:39 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-02-08 8:55 ` Andras Domokos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D49790C.4010807@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox