From: Guillaume Zajac <guillaume.zajac@linux.intel.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E04AB2A.3040002@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E04A23D.7000002@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1399 bytes --]
Hi Denis,
On 24/06/2011 16:42, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
>>> Again, this seems wrong. What is happening here is that the peer just
>>> told us that 'Yes, I can accept ACFC packets'.
>>>
>>> What you're trying to do is set whether our end can accept ACFC packets
>>> based on whether the peer can. In fact, they are completely
>>> independent. The relationship can be asymmetric, e.g. client that can
>>> send ACFC packets, but not accept them, and vice versa. You need to
>>> account for this.
>>>
>> Right, so if we always set by default ACFC options into LCP configure
>> request.
>> I could dot into
>>
>> static void lcp_reset_config_options(struct lcp_data *lcp)
>> {
>> /* Using the default ACCM */
>> lcp->req_options |= REQ_OPTION_ACFC;
>> lcp_generate_config_options(lcp);
>> }
>>
>>
>> On reception, we always say we can receive ACFC packet then it is up to
>> the peer to transmit or not ACFC packets.
>>
>> GAtPPP object only needs to know if it has to transmit or not ACFC packets.
>> That is the purpose of ppp->acfc.
> I'd like to have the option of turning off ACFC completely, so it should
> control:
> 1. Whether we advertise that we can receive ACFC packets
> 2. Whether we should try to send ACFC packets
>
Fine I will add it.
I guess we will need same kind of options for PFC.
Kind regards,
Guillaume
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 11:55 [PATCH 0/2] ACFC and PFC options implementation Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-23 18:58 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24 8:41 ` Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-24 14:42 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24 15:20 ` Guillaume Zajac [this message]
2011-06-24 15:21 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] GAtPPP: Add PFC " Guillaume Zajac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E04AB2A.3040002@linux.intel.com \
--to=guillaume.zajac@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox