Open Source Telephony
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:21:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E04AB6C.3040707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E04AB2A.3040002@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1527 bytes --]

Hi Guillaume,

On 06/24/2011 10:20 AM, Guillaume Zajac wrote:
> Hi Denis,
> 
> On 24/06/2011 16:42, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>>>> Again, this seems wrong.  What is happening here is that the peer just
>>>> told us that 'Yes, I can accept ACFC packets'.
>>>>
>>>> What you're trying to do is set whether our end can accept ACFC packets
>>>> based on whether the peer can.  In fact, they are completely
>>>> independent.  The relationship can be asymmetric, e.g. client that can
>>>> send ACFC packets, but not accept them, and vice versa.  You need to
>>>> account for this.
>>>>
>>> Right, so if we always set by default ACFC options into LCP configure
>>> request.
>>> I could dot into
>>>
>>> static void lcp_reset_config_options(struct lcp_data *lcp)
>>> {
>>>      /* Using the default ACCM */
>>>      lcp->req_options |= REQ_OPTION_ACFC;
>>>      lcp_generate_config_options(lcp);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> On reception, we always say we can receive ACFC packet then it is up to
>>> the peer to transmit or not ACFC packets.
>>>
>>> GAtPPP object only needs to know if it has to transmit or not ACFC
>>> packets.
>>> That is the purpose of ppp->acfc.
>> I'd like to have the option of turning off ACFC completely, so it should
>> control:
>> 1. Whether we advertise that we can receive ACFC packets
>> 2. Whether we should try to send ACFC packets
>>
> 
> Fine I will add it.
> I guess we will need same kind of options for PFC.
> 

Yes please ;)

Regards,
-Denis

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-24 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-16 11:55 [PATCH 0/2] ACFC and PFC options implementation Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-23 18:58   ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24  8:41     ` Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-24 14:42       ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24 15:20         ` Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-24 15:21           ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] GAtPPP: Add PFC " Guillaume Zajac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E04AB6C.3040707@gmail.com \
    --to=denkenz@gmail.com \
    --cc=ofono@ofono.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox