From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:21:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E04AB6C.3040707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E04AB2A.3040002@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1527 bytes --]
Hi Guillaume,
On 06/24/2011 10:20 AM, Guillaume Zajac wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> On 24/06/2011 16:42, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>>>> Again, this seems wrong. What is happening here is that the peer just
>>>> told us that 'Yes, I can accept ACFC packets'.
>>>>
>>>> What you're trying to do is set whether our end can accept ACFC packets
>>>> based on whether the peer can. In fact, they are completely
>>>> independent. The relationship can be asymmetric, e.g. client that can
>>>> send ACFC packets, but not accept them, and vice versa. You need to
>>>> account for this.
>>>>
>>> Right, so if we always set by default ACFC options into LCP configure
>>> request.
>>> I could dot into
>>>
>>> static void lcp_reset_config_options(struct lcp_data *lcp)
>>> {
>>> /* Using the default ACCM */
>>> lcp->req_options |= REQ_OPTION_ACFC;
>>> lcp_generate_config_options(lcp);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> On reception, we always say we can receive ACFC packet then it is up to
>>> the peer to transmit or not ACFC packets.
>>>
>>> GAtPPP object only needs to know if it has to transmit or not ACFC
>>> packets.
>>> That is the purpose of ppp->acfc.
>> I'd like to have the option of turning off ACFC completely, so it should
>> control:
>> 1. Whether we advertise that we can receive ACFC packets
>> 2. Whether we should try to send ACFC packets
>>
>
> Fine I will add it.
> I guess we will need same kind of options for PFC.
>
Yes please ;)
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 11:55 [PATCH 0/2] ACFC and PFC options implementation Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] GAtPPP: Add ACFC option support Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-23 18:58 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24 8:41 ` Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-24 14:42 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-06-24 15:20 ` Guillaume Zajac
2011-06-24 15:21 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2011-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] GAtPPP: Add PFC " Guillaume Zajac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E04AB6C.3040707@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox