From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>,
Changqing Li <changqing.li@eng.windriver.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>,
"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [master][PATCH 2/2] rootfs-postcommands.bbclass: add post func remove_unused_dnf_log_lock
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:46:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07dd26ce-3ffc-4799-9d6e-0d910477622e@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj-jeX1Km0BYSS0HYDAeC+Fckmw0QA2u41iqA2PTmjuy6w@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/18/23 04:22, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> This merged to master and it should not have happened. I'm sending a revert.
>
> Alex
Hi, Alex
I know that following patch already reverted.
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=49bad18012a4079f0dbfe6c541a46ec508940f28
But after review it again, I think maybe it is still needed.
dnf works like this, it will create log file /var/log/log_lock.pid,
and this lock file is designed to by removed after reboot, refer
following link.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/blob/master/etc/tmpfiles.d/dnf.conf
But following patch for fixing oe specific issue break above dnf design
about removing lock file.
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=742a1b71249f4da1c8d8e13e270b0eb6128a3f66
So I add this patch
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=406a72a9a47c2735b7e18cefc682b1df00d5a9aa
to remove the lock file in rootfs.
Since for dnf-native, it will not have reboot process, so it is better
to remove it at post process of rootfs, to make an clean rootfs.
Regards
//Changqing
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 10:34, Changqing Li
> <changqing.li@eng.windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/4/23 19:11, Ross Burton wrote:
>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2023, at 16:07, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org <alex.kanavin=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 11:14, Changqing Li
>>>> <changqing.li@eng.windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>> Remove log_lock.pid which maybe created during do_rootfs. In commit
>>>>> [dnf: only write the log lock to root for native dnf],
>>>>> native dnf changed to write log lock to root, and target dnf still
>>>>> use /var/log, so log_lock.pid need to be removed post do_rootfs.
>>>> This is not making clear why the file needs to be removed. What
>>>> problems occur if it is left in place? Is it supposed to be added,
>>>> then removed by dnf during do_rootfs, and if this doesn't happen, is
>>>> that a problem with dnf that needs to be fixed, rather than removing
>>>> the file manually after the fact?
>>> Absolutely. If the dnf image creation is leaving lock files then we fix the dnf image creation. Does dnf leave a daemon hanging around? Does it leave lock files when it shouldn’t? Either way, this should be in dnf or the image creation code itself, not a generic rootfs postcommand.
>> Alex and Ross, There is no dnf daemon hanging around, you are right,
>> seems like an dnf bug, I will report this to dnf upstream.
>>
>> And there is no functional problem if this file is not removed, only it
>> may confuse user there is an useless file that is generated during
>> do_rootfs, it should not exit in rootfs.
>>
>>
>> //Changqing
>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#184123): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184123
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99869451/1686489
>> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 9:14 [master][PATCH 1/2] dnf: only write the log lock to root for native dnf changqing.li
2023-06-30 9:14 ` [master][PATCH 2/2] rootfs-postcommands.bbclass: add post func remove_unused_dnf_log_lock changqing.li
2023-06-30 15:07 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2023-07-04 11:11 ` Ross Burton
2023-07-11 8:34 ` Changqing Li
2023-07-17 20:22 ` Alexander Kanavin
2023-12-05 5:46 ` Changqing Li [this message]
2023-12-05 9:55 ` Alexander Kanavin
2023-12-06 2:39 ` Changqing Li
2023-12-06 9:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07dd26ce-3ffc-4799-9d6e-0d910477622e@windriver.com \
--to=changqing.li@windriver.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=changqing.li@eng.windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ross.burton@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox