Re: [PATCH 0/6] RFC Distro config changes

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro set. This patch series
> > makes some big steps towards that goal. I'd be interested in feedback on whether it
> > does the right things and would be usable by others.
> > 
> > The key is the inclusion of a distro/defaultsetup.conf file by bitbake.conf and 
> > in turn this pulls in a variety of other common include files which can likely be
> > shared. Any point of this cycle can be overridden by another layer so its totally
> > customisable. I'd encourage users to use the pieces they can where possible so we
> > all share best practises but obviously people have choice.
> > 
> > I did dump a load of "default" variables into default-distrovars.inc, I'm not
> > calling that file finished, I just had to draw the line somewhere and start a 
> > discussion about this :)
> 
> For angstrom we had to change a few things, have a look at
> http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-angstrom/tree/conf/distro/include/angstrom-core-tweaks.inc , specifically lines 12-18 and 53-54

I don't understand what TOOLCHAIN_PATH and TOOLCHAIN_SYSPATH do, I can't
find any reference to them in OECore. For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing
to add:

+DEPLOY_DIR_append = "-uclibc"
+STAGING_DIR_TARGET_append = "-uclibc"
+STAGING_DIR_HOST_append = "-uclibc"
+SSTATE_MANIFESTS_append = "-uclibc"

to tclibc-uclibc.inc.

For the SDK/TOOLCHAIN bits, I need to have a close look at the SDK and
figure out what the implications are there as I want to ensure that they
can all be parallel installed as well as being in separate tarballs but
its something we need to look at.

Cheers,

Richard