From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] xserver-kdrive: upgrade from 1.7.99.2 to 1.10.1
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305626296.2429.179.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305588971.3424.142.camel@rex>
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 00:36 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> As far as I can tell, we can throw away xtscal, libxcalibrate, and
> calibrateproto after that change since they need that X extension. Its a
> good example of why changes need to get upstream as if the build fix was
> there, they'd have had less reason to remove it.
It is a bit of a shame that XCALIBRATE has been removed upstream, but
it's fairly self-contained and it wouldn't be all that hard for
oe[-core] to patch it back in again.
> We probably are going to need to rewrite xtscal to use XI2 at this
> point :/.
Yes, or that might be a better answer in the long term. I do have a
certain fondness for XCALIBRATE but it was never an especially elegant
solution to the problem. If XI2 can do the same thing more neatly then
updating xtscal to use it is probably the right thing. Patches welcome
I guess :-}
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-16 21:43 [PATCH 00/14] 16-May-2011 Consolidated Pull Request Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 01/14] task-core-nfs: fix a bitbake error Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:56 ` Koen Kooi
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 02/14] opkg: Bump SRCREV to 609 Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 03/14] e2fsprogs_1.41.14.bb: Package libraries into separate packages Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:58 ` Koen Kooi
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 04/14] xserver-kdrive: upgrade from 1.7.99.2 to 1.10.1 Saul Wold
2011-05-16 23:36 ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-17 4:59 ` Martin Jansa
2011-05-17 9:58 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 05/14] mutter: Recipe Update for clutter 1.6 update Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 06/14] recipes: Add Upstream-Status to various recipe patches Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 07/14] Upstream-Status update for several recipes Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 08/14] Upstream-Status: Update patch upstream-status for libfm, eggdbus, screenshot Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 09/14] linux-yocto: detect and avoid branch revision checking for AUTOREV Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] Add a new task checklicense and fix some bugs in distro_check.py Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] base.bbclass: Fix PR increment bug when PR number is a single digit Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] openssh: Don't use ${libdir}exec Saul Wold
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] perl-native: create_wrapper on perl${PV} too Saul Wold
2011-05-21 23:57 ` Leon Woestenberg
2011-05-22 5:12 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-22 11:52 ` Leon Woestenberg
2011-05-16 21:44 ` [PATCH 14/14] linux-yocto: update meta SRCREV Saul Wold
2011-05-17 13:42 ` [PATCH 00/14] 16-May-2011 Consolidated Pull Request Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305626296.2429.179.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox