Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:33:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307723606.15712.213.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1307686598.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Kang Kai (1):
>   ghostscript: update SRC_URI
> 
> Nitin A Kamble (1):
>   gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection

This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
up the source control system web interface etc.

I applied it, then had to revert it. Please test things like this more
carefully in future.

I also think we need to put these kind of patches on the website or in a
repo, we shouldn't be carrying them around in the main repo.

> Phil Blundell (1):
>   busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master
> 
> Saul Wold (1):
>   multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

I'm with Phil on this one, needs more work.

I haven't got to the other two since the gcc issue distracted me :/.

Cheers,

Richard




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-10 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-10  6:26 [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June Saul Wold
2011-06-10  6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 1/4] ghostscript: update SRC_URI Saul Wold
2011-06-10  6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 2/4] busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master Saul Wold
2011-06-10  6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 3/4] gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection Saul Wold
2011-06-10  6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 4/4] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages Saul Wold
2011-06-10  9:25   ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10  9:43     ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10 18:36     ` Saul Wold
2011-06-10 21:36       ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10 22:46         ` Saul Wold
2011-06-10 22:04   ` Khem Raj
2011-06-10 16:33 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-06-10 16:54   ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June Saul Wold
2011-06-10 16:59   ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307723606.15712.213.camel@rex \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox