From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:54:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF24C34.7060900@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307723606.15712.213.camel@rex>
On 06/10/2011 09:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Kang Kai (1):
>> ghostscript: update SRC_URI
>>
>> Nitin A Kamble (1):
>> gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
>
> This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
> up the source control system web interface etc.
>
> I applied it, then had to revert it. Please test things like this more
> carefully in future.
>
> I also think we need to put these kind of patches on the website or in a
> repo, we shouldn't be carrying them around in the main repo.
>
>> Phil Blundell (1):
>> busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master
>>
>> Saul Wold (1):
>> multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages
>
> I'm with Phil on this one, needs more work.
>
Sorry about this one, I thought I had it further along, I guess I had a
cut and paste failure (dropping the R from RDEPENDS).
> I haven't got to the other two since the gcc issue distracted me :/.
>
I did run multiple builds without failure, so I am not sure what
happened with the gcc failure.
Sau!
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 6:26 [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June Saul Wold
2011-06-10 6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 1/4] ghostscript: update SRC_URI Saul Wold
2011-06-10 6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 2/4] busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master Saul Wold
2011-06-10 6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 3/4] gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection Saul Wold
2011-06-10 6:26 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 4/4] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages Saul Wold
2011-06-10 9:25 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10 9:43 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10 18:36 ` Saul Wold
2011-06-10 21:36 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-10 22:46 ` Saul Wold
2011-06-10 22:04 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-10 16:33 ` [CONSOLIDATED PULL 0/4] 10-June Richard Purdie
2011-06-10 16:54 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-06-10 16:59 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF24C34.7060900@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox