From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/3] Move architecture specific TARGET_OS mangling into tune files
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:23:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311611027.30326.252.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311601337.2344.192.camel@rex>
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> To try and help preserve my sanity when pulling the various multilib
> patches together, I've merged these six patches, along with a patch
> incrementing bitbake's miniumum version requirement for the
> bb.utils.contains usage.
FWIW, the bitbake minimum version check (at least in its current form)
doesn't buy much in this sort of situation because you get a parse error
before the event handler in sanity.bbclass ever runs. I think this
happened last time there was a bitbake-affecting change too although I
don't recall the details.
Perhaps adding something like:
__sane_bitbake := "${oe.check_bb_version_sanity}"
to the top of bitbake.conf would improve matters, I dunno.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 14:49 [PATCH 0/3] First round of tune config file updates Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] bitbake.conf/cross.bbclass: Add ability to dynamically change library location Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] conf/machine/tune: Overhaul tune include file variables Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 15:03 ` Kumar Gala
2011-07-22 15:13 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] conf/machine/include: Set TUNE_CCARGS instead of TARGET_CC_ARCH Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 14:54 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-22 15:11 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 15:15 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-22 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/3] conf/machine/include: Start to fill out architecture specific tune include files and tune features Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 18:14 ` Tom Rini
2011-07-25 18:55 ` Mark Hatle
2011-07-25 19:34 ` Tom Rini
2011-07-25 19:39 ` Mark Hatle
2011-07-25 20:39 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-25 20:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-07-22 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/3] bitbake.conf/classes: Variable cleanup Richard Purdie
2011-07-22 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/3] Move architecture specific TARGET_OS mangling into tune files Richard Purdie
2011-07-25 13:42 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-25 16:23 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-07-27 16:37 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311611027.30326.252.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox