Re: [PATCH 6/3] Move architecture specific TARGET_OS mangling into tune files

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:23 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > To try and help preserve my sanity when pulling the various multilib
> > patches together, I've merged these six patches, along with a patch
> > incrementing bitbake's miniumum version requirement for the
> > bb.utils.contains usage.
> 
> FWIW, the bitbake minimum version check (at least in its current form)
> doesn't buy much in this sort of situation because you get a parse error
> before the event handler in sanity.bbclass ever runs.  I think this
> happened last time there was a bitbake-affecting change too although I
> don't recall the details.
> 
> Perhaps adding something like:
> 
> __sane_bitbake := "${oe.check_bb_version_sanity}"
> 
> to the top of bitbake.conf would improve matters, I dunno.

Ouch, yes, we probably should do something like this.

Cheers,

Richard