Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] tune/arch-powerpc: Use fpu-soft to set PPCPKGSFX_FPU
@ 2011-08-03  5:28 Kumar Gala
  2011-08-03 16:57 ` Richard Purdie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-08-03  5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

Its more likely that we explicitly set soft-floating point support for a
given target than hard.  So use 'fpu-soft' in TUNE_FEATURES rather than
'fpu-hard' to determine setting 'nf' (no-float) in PPCPKGSFX_FPU.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
---
* Removed setting of 'fpu-hard' from the tune files that it set

 meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc |    2 +-
 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc         |    2 +-
 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc       |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
index da1a1d6..c073f18 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ TARGET_FPU .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "soft", "", d)}
 
 ABIEXTENSION = "${@['','spe'][d.getVar('TARGET_FPU', True) in ['ppc-efd', 'ppc-efs']]}"
 
-PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-hard" , "", "-nf", d)}"
+PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "-nf", "", d)}"
 
 PPCPKGARCH = "${TUNE_ARCH}${PPCPKGSFX_FPU}"
 TUNE_PKGARCH ?= "${PPCPKGARCH}"
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc
index da8114f..9abb694 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "ppc603e", "-mcpu=603e", "
 TUNE_PKGARCH = "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'ppc603e', 'ppc603e', '${PPCPKGARCH}', d)}"
 
 AVAILTUNES += "ppc603e"
-TUNE_FEATURES_tune-ppc603e = "m32 fpu-hard ppc603e"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-ppc603e = "m32 ppc603e"
 PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-ppc603e = "powerpc ppc603e"
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc
index 64e7bdc..b5031f4 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "ppce500mc", "-mcpu=e500mc
 TUNE_PKGARCH = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "ppce500mc", "ppce500mc", "${PPCPKGARCH}", d)}"
 
 AVAILTUNES += "ppce500mc"
-TUNE_FEATURES_tune-ppce500mc = "m32 fpu-hard ppce500mc"
+TUNE_FEATURES_tune-ppce500mc = "m32 ppce500mc"
 PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-ppce500mc = "powerpc ppce500mc"
-- 
1.7.3.4




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] tune/arch-powerpc: Use fpu-soft to set PPCPKGSFX_FPU
  2011-08-03  5:28 [PATCH v2] tune/arch-powerpc: Use fpu-soft to set PPCPKGSFX_FPU Kumar Gala
@ 2011-08-03 16:57 ` Richard Purdie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-08-03 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:28 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Its more likely that we explicitly set soft-floating point support for a
> given target than hard.  So use 'fpu-soft' in TUNE_FEATURES rather than
> 'fpu-hard' to determine setting 'nf' (no-float) in PPCPKGSFX_FPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> * Removed setting of 'fpu-hard' from the tune files that it set
> 
>  meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc |    2 +-
>  meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc         |    2 +-
>  meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppce500mc.inc       |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
> index da1a1d6..c073f18 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ TARGET_FPU .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "soft", "", d)}
>  
>  ABIEXTENSION = "${@['','spe'][d.getVar('TARGET_FPU', True) in ['ppc-efd', 'ppc-efs']]}"
>  
> -PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-hard" , "", "-nf", d)}"
> +PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "-nf", "", d)}"
>  
>  PPCPKGARCH = "${TUNE_ARCH}${PPCPKGSFX_FPU}"
>  TUNE_PKGARCH ?= "${PPCPKGARCH}"
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc603e.inc

I've remembered the issue here. Further up in that file we have:

TUNEVALID[fpu-hard] = "Use hardware FPU."
TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-hard", "-mhard-float", "", d)}"

TUNEVALID[fpu-soft] = "Use software FPU."
TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "-msoft-float", "", d)}"

further up in the file and there are optionally other "float" models
which some processors seemed to need to use. This meant you had to
specify which fpu option you wanted explicitly.

I'm open to better ways of handling this.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-03 17:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-03  5:28 [PATCH v2] tune/arch-powerpc: Use fpu-soft to set PPCPKGSFX_FPU Kumar Gala
2011-08-03 16:57 ` Richard Purdie

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox