Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Yu Ke <ke@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gcc-cross-intermediate: revise the 64bithack.patch for multilib case
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:21:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313425266.14274.598.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E492C11.5040800@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 22:24 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> On 2011/8/15 21:16, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 20:48 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> >> On 2011/8/15 1:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Op 14 aug. 2011, om 15:32 heeft Yu Ke het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>>> current gcc-cross-intermediate has build failure in qemux86-64 lib64
> >>>> multilib case. the reason is that it still use lib instead of lib64
> >>>> while do_install use the libdir i.e. lib64
> >>>>
> >>>> so this patch fix this issue by making gcc honour the libdir.
> >>>>
> >>>> CC: Kumar Gala<galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> >>>> CC: Richard Purdie<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke<ke.yu@intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc             |    2 +-
> >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch |   16 +++++++++-------
> >>>
> >>> wouldn't gcc 4.5 need a similar change?
> >>
> >> yes, gcc 4.5 should also has this change. I will sent out another patch
> >> for this.
> >
> > Please take a look at:
> >
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/ml4&id=4de8e0e9c286ff64f1b7fd2e695fe2d62fdadfbd
> 
> Thanks. it is more comprehensive. just a small issue, the parentheses 
> looks mismatching in
> 
> ++MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = ../$(shell basename $(base_libdir) ../$(shell 
> basename $(base_libdir)

Right, I've just noticed my test build was failing and that is likely
why :)

> > I've updated the patch header and ensured that whichever compiler
> > options are used, the compiler works as expected and also applied this
> > to mips and pcc.
> >
> > Could you also please open a bug about target gcc multilib as mentioned
> > in the patch header (targeted at post 1.1).
> 
> done. http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1369

Great, thanks.

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-14 13:32 [PATCH 0/1] Bug fix for 1362 Yu Ke
2011-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] gcc-cross-intermediate: revise the 64bithack.patch for multilib case Yu Ke
2011-08-14 15:18   ` Khem Raj
2011-08-15 12:41     ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 15:49       ` Khem Raj
2011-08-14 17:31   ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-15 12:48     ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 13:16       ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-15 14:24         ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 16:21           ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-08-16 22:50         ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1313425266.14274.598.camel@rex \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ke@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox