From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Yu Ke <ke@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gcc-cross-intermediate: revise the 64bithack.patch for multilib case
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:21:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313425266.14274.598.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E492C11.5040800@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 22:24 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> On 2011/8/15 21:16, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 20:48 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> >> On 2011/8/15 1:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Op 14 aug. 2011, om 15:32 heeft Yu Ke het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>>> current gcc-cross-intermediate has build failure in qemux86-64 lib64
> >>>> multilib case. the reason is that it still use lib instead of lib64
> >>>> while do_install use the libdir i.e. lib64
> >>>>
> >>>> so this patch fix this issue by making gcc honour the libdir.
> >>>>
> >>>> CC: Kumar Gala<galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> >>>> CC: Richard Purdie<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke<ke.yu@intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc | 2 +-
> >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch | 16 +++++++++-------
> >>>
> >>> wouldn't gcc 4.5 need a similar change?
> >>
> >> yes, gcc 4.5 should also has this change. I will sent out another patch
> >> for this.
> >
> > Please take a look at:
> >
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/ml4&id=4de8e0e9c286ff64f1b7fd2e695fe2d62fdadfbd
>
> Thanks. it is more comprehensive. just a small issue, the parentheses
> looks mismatching in
>
> ++MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = ../$(shell basename $(base_libdir) ../$(shell
> basename $(base_libdir)
Right, I've just noticed my test build was failing and that is likely
why :)
> > I've updated the patch header and ensured that whichever compiler
> > options are used, the compiler works as expected and also applied this
> > to mips and pcc.
> >
> > Could you also please open a bug about target gcc multilib as mentioned
> > in the patch header (targeted at post 1.1).
>
> done. http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1369
Great, thanks.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-14 13:32 [PATCH 0/1] Bug fix for 1362 Yu Ke
2011-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] gcc-cross-intermediate: revise the 64bithack.patch for multilib case Yu Ke
2011-08-14 15:18 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-15 12:41 ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 15:49 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-14 17:31 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-15 12:48 ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 13:16 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-15 14:24 ` Yu Ke
2011-08-15 16:21 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-08-16 22:50 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313425266.14274.598.camel@rex \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ke@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox