* [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils @ 2012-02-21 19:07 Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 21:52 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-21 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Steve Sakoman Otherwise build fails with following error: | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, | from xmlmemory.c:8: | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> --- meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ file://libxml-64bit.patch" -- 1.7.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 19:07 [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-21 21:52 ` Richard Purdie 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:58 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-02-21 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Steve Sakoman On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > Otherwise build fails with following error: > > | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, > | from xmlmemory.c:8: > | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> > --- > meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ > file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" > > DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" > -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" > +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" > > SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ > file://libxml-64bit.patch" This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils? Its going to add considerable time to the build too. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 21:52 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:48 ` Martin Jansa 2012-02-22 15:09 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:58 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-21 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: >> Otherwise build fails with following error: >> >> | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, >> | from xmlmemory.c:8: >> | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory >> >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ >> file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" >> >> DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" >> -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" >> +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" >> >> SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ >> file://libxml-64bit.patch" > > This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native > I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils? For some reason the libxml2 configure phase decides that ansidecl.h from binutils is present, but then at compile time it finds that it actually isn't there! I saw the same issue on both my desktop and autobuilder setups. I'll try a clean build to see if the problem persists. The libz change from last week seems to have put my builds in a bad state, and the PR bumps intended to fix things really don't seem to be fixing things, at least on my build machines. I suspect it might be faster to do a clean build than to track down where the corruption is. Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-21 22:48 ` Martin Jansa 2012-02-21 23:02 ` Phil Blundell 2012-02-22 15:09 ` Steve Sakoman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2012-02-21 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2657 bytes --] On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:26:49PM -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > >> Otherwise build fails with following error: > >> > >> | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, > >> | from xmlmemory.c:8: > >> | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> > >> --- > >> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > >> index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 > >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc > >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ > >> file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" > >> > >> DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" > >> -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" > >> +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" > >> > >> SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ > >> file://libxml-64bit.patch" > > > > This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native > > I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils? > > For some reason the libxml2 configure phase decides that ansidecl.h > from binutils is present, but then at compile time it finds that it > actually isn't there! I saw the same issue on both my desktop and > autobuilder setups. > > I'll try a clean build to see if the problem persists. The libz > change from last week seems to have put my builds in a bad state, and > the PR bumps intended to fix things really don't seem to be fixing > things, at least on my build machines. I suspect it might be faster > to do a clean build than to track down where the corruption is. The list of PR bumped recipes probably wasn't complete for you. It was for me, but later I've noticed that ie subversion-1.6 wasn't bumped, because I'm using only 1.7. So it was complete for my default build (when those PR bumps were applied to all included layers at once, which is not the case for most people) and if you build different recipes or different versions you have to add your own PR bumps in those recipes (see khem's script). Clean build could be faster but doesn't fix installed -dev packages on target.. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 22:48 ` Martin Jansa @ 2012-02-21 23:02 ` Phil Blundell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-02-21 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 23:48 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:26:49PM -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > I'll try a clean build to see if the problem persists. The libz > > change from last week seems to have put my builds in a bad state, and > > the PR bumps intended to fix things really don't seem to be fixing > > things, at least on my build machines. I suspect it might be faster > > to do a clean build than to track down where the corruption is. > > The list of PR bumped recipes probably wasn't complete for you. It was > for me, but later I've noticed that ie subversion-1.6 wasn't bumped, > because I'm using only 1.7. > > So it was complete for my default build (when those PR bumps were > applied to all included layers at once, which is not the case for most > people) and if you build different recipes or different versions you > have to add your own PR bumps in those recipes (see khem's script). > > Clean build could be faster but doesn't fix installed -dev packages on > target.. I still don't entirely understand why we don't just put libz.la back the way it was. I can understand the attraction of eliminating .la files in a general sense, but it doesn't seem as though the removal of this particular one is buying us much. What is the reason for expending so much effort on getting rid of it? p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:48 ` Martin Jansa @ 2012-02-22 15:09 ` Steve Sakoman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-22 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: >>> Otherwise build fails with following error: >>> >>> | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, >>> | from xmlmemory.c:8: >>> | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >>> index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ >>> file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" >>> >>> DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" >>> -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" >>> +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" >>> >>> SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ >>> file://libxml-64bit.patch" >> >> This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native >> I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils? > > For some reason the libxml2 configure phase decides that ansidecl.h > from binutils is present, but then at compile time it finds that it > actually isn't there! I saw the same issue on both my desktop and > autobuilder setups. > > I'll try a clean build to see if the problem persists. The libz > change from last week seems to have put my builds in a bad state, and > the PR bumps intended to fix things really don't seem to be fixing > things, at least on my build machines. I suspect it might be faster > to do a clean build than to track down where the corruption is. FWIW, a clean build resolved the binutils dependency, so the above patch is not required. I suspect that the current set of PR bumps for the zlib issue still aren't sufficient for many users, but I'm hoping the switch to OEBasicHash will minimize further pain. Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils 2012-02-21 21:52 ` Richard Purdie 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman @ 2012-02-21 22:58 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2012-02-21 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Steve Sakoman On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: >> Otherwise build fails with following error: >> >> | In file included from libxml.h:36:0, >> | from xmlmemory.c:8: >> | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory >> >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> index 0979acd..6230f60 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \ >> file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e" >> >> DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native" >> -DEPENDS =+ "zlib" >> +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils" >> >> SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \ >> file://libxml-64bit.patch" > > This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native > I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils? configure detects the header and then uses it. So as long as you provide binutils or not provide consistently it will build in a consistent way whats happening here probably is that its configured with binutils-dev being staged but is building without then being in staging. > > Its going to add considerable time to the build too. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-22 15:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-21 19:07 [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 21:52 ` Richard Purdie 2012-02-21 22:26 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:48 ` Martin Jansa 2012-02-21 23:02 ` Phil Blundell 2012-02-22 15:09 ` Steve Sakoman 2012-02-21 22:58 ` Khem Raj
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox