Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: Move libcrypto to base_libdir
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:40:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329864016.2591.195.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F441987.2010800@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:24 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 08:01 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > This fix is for dhclient. It needs libcrypto at runtime and if
> > libcrypto is in libdir, it's path can be inaccessible on systems
> > where /usr is on nfs for example or dhclient is needed before
> > /usr is mounted.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan<andrei@gherzan.ro>
> > ---
> >   ...001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >   meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc      |   10 +++-
> >   .../recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.0.0g.bb |    2 +-
> >   3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..b101d8c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> > +From ac1fe1490e997fb8fd91ec13b675d38efcc65775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > +From: Andrei Gherzan<andrei@gherzan.ro>
> > +Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:03:38 +0200
> > +Subject: [PATCH] openssl: Move libcrypto to base_libdir
> > +
> > +This fix is for dhclient. It needs libcrypto at runtime and if
> > +libcrypto is in libdir, it's path can be inaccessible on systems
> > +where /usr is on nfs for example or dhclient is needed before
> > +/usr is mounted.
> > +
> Seems to be missing Upstream-Status

Really?  There doesn't seem to be any genuine patch here.  As far as I
can tell, that 0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch file is
some old version of the changeset which has somehow gotten checked in as
a git format-patch'd diff.  I think it should be deleted, not given an
upstream-status.

p.





  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-21 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-10 16:01 [PATCH] openssl: Move libcrypto to base_libdir Andrei Gherzan
2012-02-21 22:24 ` Saul Wold
2012-02-21 22:40   ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2012-02-21 22:53     ` Andrei Gherzan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-09 18:30 Andrei Gherzan
2012-02-09 18:33 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-09 19:54   ` Khem Raj
2012-02-10 13:37     ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-09 18:34 ` Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1329864016.2591.195.camel@x121e.pbcl.net \
    --to=philb@gnu.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox