* QEMU recipe cleanup
@ 2012-02-22 15:21 Paul Eggleton
2012-02-22 23:15 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-02-22 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Hi all,
I was looking into Yocto bug #2020 today and I noticed we have some "old" QEMU
recipes kicking around. 0.15.1 is the latest version which AFAIK I've been
using since it was merged mid-October last year, and it seems to be working
fine. We also have 0.14.0 and a _git recipe which claims (via manually set PV)
to be 0.14.0 as well.
Do we need to keep all of these?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: QEMU recipe cleanup
2012-02-22 15:21 QEMU recipe cleanup Paul Eggleton
@ 2012-02-22 23:15 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-02-22 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 15:21 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking into Yocto bug #2020 today and I noticed we have some "old" QEMU
> recipes kicking around. 0.15.1 is the latest version which AFAIK I've been
> using since it was merged mid-October last year, and it seems to be working
> fine. We also have 0.14.0 and a _git recipe which claims (via manually set PV)
> to be 0.14.0 as well.
>
> Do we need to keep all of these?
I'd axe the 0.14 version if nobody shouts. I think it was kept as 0.15
changed a lot of things and we had some issues. I think they're all
resolved now though.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-22 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-22 15:21 QEMU recipe cleanup Paul Eggleton
2012-02-22 23:15 ` Richard Purdie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox