Re: [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

[Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>]

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 09:38 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> With the above goal in mind, can you accept either of my proposed
> patches as an interim solution? Either as an added tiny DISTRO_FEATURE
> or as a simple addition to the defconfig? I do believe these two
> features are useful beyond poky-tiny.

Well, obviously it isn't my place to accept or reject your patch; one of
the oe-core maintainers would have to make that decision.  But,
personally, given a choice between those two options I would prefer the
latter.

However, I do still think that the best interim approach is just to
provide a suitable, complete defconfig file in whatever layer contains
poky-tiny.  This doesn't need to involve splitting poky-tiny into its
own layer, doesn't require any extra tooling in oe-core in the short
term, and doesn't necessarily even need to involve a .bbappend (although
it would probably be easiest if it did).

p.