Re: [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

[Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>]

On 06/18/2012 04:35 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 09:38 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> With the above goal in mind, can you accept either of my proposed
>> patches as an interim solution? Either as an added tiny DISTRO_FEATURE
>> or as a simple addition to the defconfig? I do believe these two
>> features are useful beyond poky-tiny.
> 
> Well, obviously it isn't my place to accept or reject your patch; one of
> the oe-core maintainers would have to make that decision.  But,
> personally, given a choice between those two options I would prefer the
> latter.
> 
> However, I do still think that the best interim approach is just to
> provide a suitable, complete defconfig file in whatever layer contains
> poky-tiny.  This doesn't need to involve splitting poky-tiny into its
> own layer, doesn't require any extra tooling in oe-core in the short
> term, and doesn't necessarily even need to involve a .bbappend (although
> it would probably be easiest if it did).

I'm going to look into this approach today.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel