* [PATCH] gtk-doc: Ensure we run gtkdocize else we could see build failures (e.g. evolution-data-server)
@ 2012-07-20 15:55 Richard Purdie
2012-07-20 19:29 ` Ross Burton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
This is a fix to Ross' series, we need to run gtkdocize in case anything
was built from source control and the appropriate files are missing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
---
diff --git a/meta/classes/gtk-doc.bbclass b/meta/classes/gtk-doc.bbclass
index 603b191..8a312f5 100644
--- a/meta/classes/gtk-doc.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/gtk-doc.bbclass
@@ -14,3 +14,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF_append = "\
--disable-gtk-doc-html \
--disable-gtk-doc-pdf \
"
+
+do_configure_prepend () {
+ gtkdocize
+}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] gtk-doc: Ensure we run gtkdocize else we could see build failures (e.g. evolution-data-server)
2012-07-20 15:55 [PATCH] gtk-doc: Ensure we run gtkdocize else we could see build failures (e.g. evolution-data-server) Richard Purdie
@ 2012-07-20 19:29 ` Ross Burton
2012-07-22 12:13 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ross Burton @ 2012-07-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 16:55, Richard Purdie wrote:
> This is a fix to Ross' series, we need to run gtkdocize in case anything
> was built from source control and the appropriate files are missing.
Good point but I'm curious how the build was succeeding/what broke before this.
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gtk-doc: Ensure we run gtkdocize else we could see build failures (e.g. evolution-data-server)
2012-07-20 19:29 ` Ross Burton
@ 2012-07-22 12:13 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-07-22 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ross Burton; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 20:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Friday, 20 July 2012 at 16:55, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > This is a fix to Ross' series, we need to run gtkdocize in case anything
> > was built from source control and the appropriate files are missing.
>
> Good point but I'm curious how the build was succeeding/what broke before this.
Probably you used an existing build which already had the gtk-doc.make
file touched and your didn't bump PR. The file therefore hung around. It
would only happen on something built from SCM (evolution-data-server is
a git recipe).
I'm guessing if you clean eds, it would show up.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-22 12:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-20 15:55 [PATCH] gtk-doc: Ensure we run gtkdocize else we could see build failures (e.g. evolution-data-server) Richard Purdie
2012-07-20 19:29 ` Ross Burton
2012-07-22 12:13 ` Richard Purdie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox