From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Fix RPATH warning in the face of funny path strings
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:28:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345199307.26132.13.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502D314F.5010302@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:43 -0700, Andy Ross wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 01:39 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > If these RPATHs are causing host pollution then that sounds like there
> > is another bug elsewhere. They ought to be resolved relative to the
> > sysroot during link edit.
>
> Indeed, this is turning out to be a deeper issue than I wanted it to
> be. What seems to be is happening is this: an RPATH in the ELF header
> is interpreted relative to sysroot normally. But when linking, a
> -rpath argument to the ld is interpreted relative to the *host*
> filesystem even when there is a --sysroot argument. See the quick
> test script below.
>
> As it happens, both of those are ultimately produced by libtool, and
> it's only the second one that is fatal. The RPATH itself is probably
> still a warning condition, but it's not a build breaker. But neither
> is needed, they are happening in the case I'm looking at only because
> libtool (I think) is confused by the "/../" syntax in the link path
> into trying to add an RPATH where one isn't needed.
>
> The specific case I'm looking at (with our internal tree, I'm working
> on reproducing vs. poky right now) is with a pulseaudio build, where
> an x86-64 build on an x86_64 host hits a RPATH in libgdk-x11-2.0 that
> pulls in the host libXranr and fails due to version skew. I was just
> pointed at a discussion from last week on owl_video which looks all
> but identical.
>
> At least for the moment I'm going to try to track down the libtool
> issue (maybe sanify the path before it sees if if possible) instead of
> trying to fix a linker bug.
I suspect you need to look somewhere around:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/fix-rpath.patch
and normalise the rpaths being used by libtool. I think it has some kind
of path normalisation function somewhere...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 22:46 [PATCH] Fix RPATH warning vs. weird paths Andy Ross
2012-08-15 22:46 ` [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Fix RPATH warning in the face of funny path strings Andy Ross
2012-08-16 0:14 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-16 16:10 ` Andy Ross
2012-08-16 16:10 ` Andy Ross
2012-08-16 8:39 ` Phil Blundell
2012-08-16 17:43 ` Andy Ross
2012-08-17 10:28 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-08-17 15:02 ` Andy Ross
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-17 16:20 [PATCH 1/2] " Richard Purdie
2012-08-20 21:05 ` [PATCH] " Andy Ross
2012-08-21 15:49 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345199307.26132.13.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox