Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eglibc: Fix for dynamic linker broken offset
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:02:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348840977.32611.51.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5065ACC4.7080505@windriver.com>

On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> >> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
> >>>> +-	    *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
> >>>> ++	    *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
> >>> That patch looks slightly dubious to me.  Are you sure this doesn't
> >>> introduce any regressions elsewhere?
> >>>
> >> I have insufficient data to affirm that it doesn't introduces regressions.
> >
> > Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites,
> > right?
> 
> That patch is a workaround for an ARM issue related to thread local storage and 
> TLS offsets during runtime and prelinking.
> 
> See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
> 
> Note, this is simply a workaround and not a final solution as it hasn't been 
> vetted upstream.

Right, I understand that.  But this doesn't really answer the question
"does the workaround break anything else?".

p.





  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-28 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24 11:26 [PATCH] eglibc: Fix for dynamic linker broken offset Andrei Dinu
2012-09-24 11:30 ` Phil Blundell
2012-09-24 12:40   ` Andrei Dinu
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Phil Blundell
2012-09-28 13:57       ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-28 14:00         ` Khem Raj
2012-09-28 14:02         ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2012-09-28 14:35           ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-28 14:50             ` Khem Raj
2012-09-28 14:57             ` Phil Blundell
2012-09-28 15:02               ` Mark Hatle
     [not found]       ` <50659938.4060401@intel.com>
2012-10-02 16:50         ` Phil Blundell
2012-09-24 14:34 ` Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1348840977.32611.51.camel@phil-desktop \
    --to=philb@gnu.org \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox