[PATCH] recipe_sanity: Don't bother checking LICENSE

[PATCH] recipe_sanity: Don't bother checking LICENSE

[Phil Blundell]

Since e3d7890cace71b0a57d2530bf615a58dcb46d96f or so, base.bbclass has
considered invalid LICENSE settings to be a fatal error.  This means we
will never see them so there is no point checking for that.

Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
---
 meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass |    9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
index c3bd0d2..bf378ea 100644
--- a/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ def bad_runtime_vars(cfgdata, d):
             __note("%s should be %s_${PN}" % (var, var), d)
 
 __recipe_sanity_reqvars = "DESCRIPTION"
-__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = "LICENSE"
+__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = ""
 def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
     for var in d.getVar("__recipe_sanity_reqvars", True).split():
         if not d.getVar(var, 0):
@@ -23,11 +23,6 @@ def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
         val = d.getVar(var, 0)
         cfgval = cfgdata.get(var)
 
-        # Hardcoding is bad, but I'm lazy.  We don't care about license being
-        # unset if the recipe has no sources!
-        if var == "LICENSE" and d.getVar("SRC_URI", True) == cfgdata.get("SRC_URI"):
-            continue
-
         if not val:
             __note("%s should be set" % var, d)
         elif val == cfgval:
@@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ def can_remove_FILESDIR(cfgdata, d):
             expanded == d.expand(expected))
 
 def can_remove_others(p, cfgdata, d):
-    for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "LICENSE", "DEPENDS",
+    for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "DEPENDS",
               "SECTION", "PACKAGES", "EXTRA_OECONF", "EXTRA_OEMAKE"]:
     #for k in cfgdata:
         unexpanded = d.getVar(k, 0)
-- 
1.7.10.4

Re: [PATCH] recipe_sanity: Don't bother checking LICENSE

[Saul Wold]

On 10/01/2012 09:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Since e3d7890cace71b0a57d2530bf615a58dcb46d96f or so, base.bbclass has
> considered invalid LICENSE settings to be a fatal error.  This means we
> will never see them so there is no point checking for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> ---
>   meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass |    9 ++-------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
> index c3bd0d2..bf378ea 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ def bad_runtime_vars(cfgdata, d):
>               __note("%s should be %s_${PN}" % (var, var), d)
>
>   __recipe_sanity_reqvars = "DESCRIPTION"
> -__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = "LICENSE"
> +__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = ""
>   def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
>       for var in d.getVar("__recipe_sanity_reqvars", True).split():
>           if not d.getVar(var, 0):
> @@ -23,11 +23,6 @@ def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
>           val = d.getVar(var, 0)
>           cfgval = cfgdata.get(var)
>
> -        # Hardcoding is bad, but I'm lazy.  We don't care about license being
> -        # unset if the recipe has no sources!
> -        if var == "LICENSE" and d.getVar("SRC_URI", True) == cfgdata.get("SRC_URI"):
> -            continue
> -
>           if not val:
>               __note("%s should be set" % var, d)
>           elif val == cfgval:
> @@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ def can_remove_FILESDIR(cfgdata, d):
>               expanded == d.expand(expected))
>
>   def can_remove_others(p, cfgdata, d):
> -    for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "LICENSE", "DEPENDS",
> +    for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "DEPENDS",
>                 "SECTION", "PACKAGES", "EXTRA_OECONF", "EXTRA_OEMAKE"]:
>       #for k in cfgdata:
>           unexpanded = d.getVar(k, 0)
>

Merged into OE-Core

Thanks
	Sau!