build logs of all images in or-core

build logs of all images in or-core

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --]

Hi All,

On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built
successfully. I have posted the logs
here

http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/

if anyone wants to take a look

-Khem

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 345 bytes --]

Re: build logs of all images in or-core

[Saul Wold]

On 11/28/2012 11:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
> for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built
> successfully. I have posted the logs
> here
>

Thanks for doing that, I guess it's a little different than the 
Autobuilder, so most images should build.

Can you give us a clue about what did not build?

Thanks

	Sau!

> http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/
>
> if anyone wants to take a look
>
> -Khem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

Re: build logs of all images in or-core

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 11:06 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
> for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built
> successfully. I have posted the logs
> here
> 
> http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/
> 
> if anyone wants to take a look

Could you split them into two directories, successes and failures?

I'm interested in one set and not the other ;-)

Cheers,

Richard

Re: build logs of all images in or-core

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1194 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/2012 11:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
>> for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built
>> successfully. I have posted the logs
>> here
>>
>>
> Thanks for doing that, I guess it's a little different than the
> Autobuilder, so most images should build.
>
>
yes I am using just oe-core standalone. no more layers



> Can you give us a clue about what did not build?
>
>
I have pruned the logs and moved the failed build logs to

http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/failed/


> Thanks
>
>         Sau!
>
>  http://sakrah.dontexist.org/**files/oe-core/<http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/>
>>
>> if anyone wants to take a look
>>
>> -Khem
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.**openembedded.org<Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openembedded-core<http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2693 bytes --]

Re: build logs of all images in or-core

[Richard Purdie]

I had a look through these and we can group them as follows:

Unsupported configuration and sensible error given to user:

  [x11 instead of directfb enabled]
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-gtk-directfb.log
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-gtk-directfb.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-gtk-directfb.log
  eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-gtk-directfb.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-gtk-directfb.log

  [live image doesn't work on architecture]
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log

  [Built ok but was misconfigured (two kernels)]
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-rt-sdk.log
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-rt.log
  eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-rt-sdk.log
  eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-rt.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-rt-sdk.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-rt.log

  [No linux-yocto-rt]
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-rt-sdk.log
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-rt.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-rt-sdk.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-rt.log	

In the above list, I would say that the two kernels being built is a bug
we should really fix, the only way to fix it is to make the bitbake
warning about multiple providers an error.

The "interesting" build failures:

  [download issue, enable to fetch sources]
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-lsb-sdk.log

  [weird license build failures]
  eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-minimal.log
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-minimal-dev.log
  eglibc.qemumips.core-image-sato-dev.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-lsb-dev.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal-dev.log
  eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal.log
  eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-basic.log	
  eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-minimal-dev.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-basic.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-minimal-dev.log
  eglibc.qemux86.core-image-x11.log

Of which this weird license issue is definitely the biggest problem and
the one we need to figure out. The download issue looks to be transient.

Cheers,

Richard