public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] libpcap: Add missing libusb dependency
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:50:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359064215.3616.20.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ba0f6007c1a72e2ee249a47610003031f6c1079.1359061155.git.raj.khem@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 13:07 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> libpcap notices libusb in its configure if its sysrooted
> and ignores it if its not. But this causes problems since
> there is no explicit dependency on libusb. Rebuild from shared
> state sometimes fails when libusb has not been yet populated
> in sysroot and libpcap has. And do_configure of consumers of libpcap e.g. tcpdump
> are probing for features on libpcap. All the tests fail since
> none of link steps succeed and it sees as if libpcap does
> not have required features and configure of tcpdump bails out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap.inc |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Do we need libusb support in libpcap? What does this dependency buy us
and couldn't we force it off instead?

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-24 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-24 21:07 [PATCH 00/11] recipes refreshed for uclibc and systemd update to 197 Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 01/11] libpcap: Add missing libusb dependency Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:50   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-01-24 22:14     ` Khem Raj
2013-01-24 22:42       ` Chris Larson
2013-01-24 22:49         ` Richard Purdie
2013-01-25  1:00           ` Khem Raj
2013-01-25  4:30           ` Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 02/11] gettext: Fix build with uclibc remove upstreamed patches Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] libtirpc: Disable DES functions on uclibc Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 04/11] rpcbind: Dont use nss with uclibc Khem Raj
2013-01-25 14:20   ` Richard Purdie
2013-01-25 17:22     ` Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 05/11] quota: inherit gettext Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 06/11] icu: Fix build on uclibc Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 07/11] uclibc-git/uClibc.distro: Enable UCLIBC_HAS_REENTRANT_RPC Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 08/11] tcmode-default.inc: Switch to git version of uclibc by default Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 09/11] systemd: Fix build on ppc Khem Raj
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 10/11] systemd: Upgrade to 197 Khem Raj
2013-01-25 16:04   ` Burton, Ross
2013-01-25 16:08     ` Martin Jansa
2013-01-25 16:10       ` Burton, Ross
2013-01-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 11/11] gawk: Add missing dependency on readline Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359064215.3616.20.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox